This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Museums Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. New York City Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Black Lives Matter Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Black Lives Matter, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Black Lives Matter on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Black Lives MatterWikipedia:WikiProject Black Lives MatterTemplate:WikiProject Black Lives MatterBlack Lives Matter articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Visual arts This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

I think we should mention the concept of including exhibition objects to deliberately evoke archaeological finds from the 2011 excavation. This is in several secondary sources, including the connection between the rubber comb in the exhibition and the gutta-percha one from the excavation, although there is also a conflation in a couple places like image captions. The concept of evoking objects from the excavation is also mentioned prominently on the Met's primary source video of the exhibition with curators, and both combs are pictured, though not directly together. It's also stated on the video that glass pieces from the excavation were a big inspiration.-- Pharos ( talk) 17:56, 3 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Go for it. When I removed it from the caption, it was because we were citing only (a) the met itself, and (b) a source which said "evoke" but also said it was the same comb found in the Seneca Village Project. Felt too confusing. If you restore, it may be best to avoid citing that source with it (Hyperallergic) or others that make the inaccurate claim. Also probably best in the article rather than in the caption (or both). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:21, 3 February 2022 (UTC) reply