From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This needs to be better

A few paragraphs on almost 400 years of history, and a section dedicated to a television show no one remembers? C'mon history buffs, get too it. MarkinBoston 02:34, 9 August 2007 (UTC) reply

There should be a 'bot that tells everyone writing this kind of post to spend their energy on the article instead. Also, much of that would really belong in the Boston article, not this one. flux.books 19:56, 13 September 2007 (UTC) reply

TV Series, suggested split

The section concerning the TV series of the same name really is different from the subject of the main article. Only location is the same. It's like having an entire section on Jack Welch just because he lives there. I think it should be split into a separate article. ► DRTïllberġ ◄ Talk 04:58, 8 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Absolutely flux.books 19:57, 13 September 2007 (UTC) reply

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 22:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beacon Hill, Boston. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:20, 16 July 2017 (UTC) reply