This article is being reviewed as part of the
WikiProject Good Articles. We're doing
Sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the
GA criteria. This article was awarded GA-status back in 2006, so I will be assessing the article to ensure that it is still compliant.
Pyrotec (
talk) 18:24, 15 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Initial comments
This appears to be a comprehensive, wide-ranging article, but it lacks adequate/sufficient in-line citations in some sections; and there are some {{
citation needed}} flags. However, I see that someone is working on fixing some of these problems.
I will now go through this article section by section, but leaving the
WP:Lead until last.
Pyrotec (
talk) 12:03, 17 August 2009 (UTC)reply
History -
Development and origins -
Ref 3 states "See BART Composite Report, prepared by Parsons Brinkerhof Tutor Bechtel, 1962", but this does not appear to be referenced in the report.
This is a bit short, but the other defects out-number this one.
I'm putting the article On Hold so that these points can be addressed.
Pyrotec (
talk) 19:23, 19 August 2009 (UTC)reply
I've done quite a bit to answer some of the complaints, however it is still far from perfect. I'll try to do something about the intro, it is indeed heavily lacking.
Kyteto (
talk) 22:56, 25 August 2009 (UTC)reply
You've do a great job so far. Thanks very much. 08:07, 26 August 2009 (UTC)