From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Oklahoma Question

Although, we can't say that Oklahoma won the 2005 game, shouldn't it still say that Oklahoma has appeared in the championship game four times, 2000, 2004, 2005, and 2008? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.98.174.25 ( talk) 21:36, 7 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Yes, it should, I suspect that is an unfortunate civilian casualty of the edits made by Starcade. 173.76.109.232 ( talk) 21:44, 7 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Heisman Trophy winners in BCS games

Should this section not be title Heisman Trophy winners in BCS National Championship games considering this article is about the BCS NCG not just BCS Bowls. If so then Ron Dayne and Carson Palmer should be removed from the list and all of the (NCG)'s as well as it is obvious that it is a NCG in that case. Libalaustin1990 ( talk) 04:56, 26 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Incorrect Information: "Game Results"

The 2013 season's national championship game has not yet been played, but this section lists Florida State as the winner and Auburn as the Loser. Is there a better way to have this matchup listed without including incorrect information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.126.141.219 ( talk) 02:56, 9 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:BCS National Championship Game/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

To get to GA:
  • Sources, Sources, Sources.
  • Images?
  • Information in the lead should be found in greater detail in the main text of the article. So, more content, shorter lead.
  • Needs considerably more content.↔ NMajdantalk 19:15, 30 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Last edited at 19:15, 30 July 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 08:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BCS National Championship Game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:52, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply