This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Indigenous languages of California, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Indigenous languages of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous languages of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous languages of CaliforniaIndigenous languages of California articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Endangered languages, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Endangered languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Endangered languagesTemplate:WikiProject Endangered languagesEndangered languages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Native Americans,
Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related
indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Atsugewi language/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following
several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Has phonlogical/grammar tables and refs, but otherwise is only a stub --
Skookum1 (11 May 06)
Besides which, the language box needs improvement, discussion of its extinction needs to be clearer and more detailed, and discussion of its relationships with other languages needs to be significantly clarified and improved. Also needs sourcing --
Miskwito (
talk) 23:58, 26 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Last edited at 23:58, 26 April 2009 (UTC).
Substituted at 08:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Evaluating Content
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
Everything written is relevant to the topic.
Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
Because this language is now a dead language, there is no information out of date.
What else could be improved?
It's missing some citations. For example, the part about the language's last speaker has no traceable source.
