This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Plants Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

There is written in the article cloning: Many organisms, including aspen trees, reproduce by cloning. But this is not true! The aspen tree builde its babies in a very different way than person do "cloning" in the laboratories! Its not the same "cloning"! Absolutly not!

We just are at the beginning of understanding the very comlex and complicated theme gene, clone, reproducing, genetics and all the subjects that are important around that. Even a doc that has more then 50 years of expericance, or for a natural science prof it is a hard and complecated subjects! If just speak with 3 of them our own oppinion can become more clear. Without speaking with people of expericance from different views, we are not possible to get a differentiated perspective! Thats for sure! In every subject in live! If we write down the important things, we are f.e.g. able to easy remember things. If we dont write down, our own memory is overloaded nowadays.

If the system of nationalsozialism about 70 years ago, would take much more time for its development, for the verification and finding of the optimum and the truth, it would for sure not be the same result in the ending. - If we look at the details exactly and accurate, than we can begin to understand, but not without that, ont by just reading and cloning or just coping words and oppinion of other people. - Everybody should have true and at least differentiated informations, but how, when ther is so much hidden and unclear, dubious positioned publicity, ads, promotions, recruitments, adverts...or just everywhere the god and religion of making money. -- 2A02:1205:5009:C1F0:5848:B189:CE93:EFEF ( talk) 15:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC) reply

The article says "Aspen is a common name for certain tree species; some, but not all, are classified by botanists in the section Populus," but the citation which follows the statement does not support the "but not all" clause, nor does any other part of the article. Can someone justify this statement somehow? I'm not really a botany expert per se, but I've never heard of an aspen that is not a poplar, and I'm skeptical. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.216.158.233 ( talk) 21:10, 12 October 2018 (UTC) reply