This page was
proposed for deletion by
Randomtime (
talk ·
contribs) on 7 August 2008 with the comment: possible copyvio |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
'An architecture framework is used to structure the concepts and relationships of the Archimate Language' - what does this mean? Is it suggesting that Archimate is an architecture framework (ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011 defines it as an Architecture Description Language). It can't be both an Archimate language and architecture framework. Some clarification is needed here. If it is an architecture framework then some justification is needed (preferably with respect to international standards).
Wikitect ( talk) 18:04, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
The draft of an earlier version of this article from User:HansvanDrunen (see here) is copy/pasted (see here) and integrated (see here) into this article. Just for the record I did contacted Hans van Drunen first and asked and received his approval. This text has been integrated because I think it gives appropriate more detailed information, but it does need some more references. -- Mdd ( talk) 23:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello admin for this page,
The Dragon1 open EA Method (www.dragon1.org) is not the same as Dragon1 EA Tool (www.dragon1.com)
The line Dragon1 EA Method (certified by the Open Group for ArchiMate 2) should be changed into Dragon1 EA Tool https://www.dragon1.com/ea-tool or https://www.dragon1.com
Here is the Open Group conformance statement: https://www.dragon1.com/downloads/archimate2toolconformancestatement_dragon1.html
PS: Dragon1 EA Tool is also mentioned bij Gartner: http://www.gartner.com/technology/reprints.do?id=1-2Q45NIB&ct=151020&st=sb
Kind regards, Mark Paauwe mark.paauwe@dragon1.com Mark Paauwe ( talk) 13:47, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Some of the material in the page (as of 27 June 2016) has been rendered out of date by the release of ArchiMate 3.0. Version 3 adds new Strategy and Physical layers that leaves the layer diagram on this page out of date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aabs ( talk • contribs) 02:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on ArchiMate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:37, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on ArchiMate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:04, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
In the introduction, it is said that arxhimate comes with visualization techniques but the rest of the text deals with model and structure. What kind of diagrams or visualizations are in the standard?
Dostl ba ( talk) 18:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC) Dostl ba ( talk) 18:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
@ 75.136.71.45: There are entire articles discussing sofware tools, e. g. Comparison of file comparison tools. The list of Archimate Tools is essential for the article. Pls stop removing it. -- Karl Hilpolt ( talk) 13:55, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
I fail to understood why ArchiMate is considered an open standard. Is there more source then the Open Group themself? As far as I can see, it requires a fee at least for commercial use like EN or ISO - if I want to read and even comply to them with my product, I have to pay a licence fee. Reference for spec: In text body are two links: under licence and evaluation copy instant after registration. The first links tells me, that as a non-member I get only "a free, personal, 90-day Evaluation License" and as a member I can get "a personal annual Member License". The evaluation copy offers to turn into "use it internally under a free, perpetual Non-Commercial License". So as far as I understand Open access and open source there is not so much open here - only "open to fee payers". Am I the only one that thinks ArchiMate and ISO are in terms of access and usage quite the same - and not really open? Is there any definition of an "open standard"? The OMG requires neither login nor fees to access and comply to their standards. (I refrain from discussing a business model for standardization groups, just the term "open" for a standard) 77.47.94.133 ( talk) 16:55, 16 March 2022 (UTC)