NASA expansion - second and fourth paragraphs Done (with fourth paragraph, still need second)
Kees08 (
talk) 06:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Manned Spacecraft Center - first paragraph DoneJustinTime55 (
talk) 20:55, 17 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Choosing a mission mode - first and third paragraphs
@
Hawkeye7: Can you clarify what you want cited in these paragraphs? Might have already been done.
Kees08 (
talk) 01:53, 9 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Saturn IB - first paragraph DoneKees08 (
talk) 06:26, 8 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Saturn V - second paragraph DoneKees08 (
talk) 07:14, 6 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Lunar mission profile - all paragraphs Done A single reference sufficiently verifies all "paragraphs"; this is really more of a table with graphics than a section of prose paragraphs, which makes one continuous profile. I do not believe that requiring a cite at each individual paragraph is reasonable.JustinTime55 (
talk) 12:26, 8 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Profile variations - first, second, third paragraphs DoneKees08 (
talk) 02:28, 9 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Preparation for manned flight - first, second and third paragraphs DoneKees08 (
talk) 03:04, 9 July 2016 (UTC)reply
JustinTime55,
Hawkeye7, this review has been stalled for quite some time. Are further edits going to be made, or should the review be closed?
The requirement that the article meet the requirements of
WP:LEAD has not been met in one important aspect: there's a limit of four paragraphs for any lead, and this one comes in at five sizable paragraphs. Please adjust the lead accordingly. Many thanks.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 23:29, 7 July 2016 (UTC)reply
I have reduced the lead to four succinct paragraphs. I hadn't paid much attention to the review because I have been overseas at Wikimania in Esino Lario, and am still on my way home. I saw little need to fail the article so long as progress was being made towards fixing the problems identified in the review. I could pitch in and help, but not until I get back. I can fail it at any time.
Hawkeye7 (
talk) 01:32, 8 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Just a note that this is not an absolute requirement, and I won't fail a GA assessment over it.
Hawkeye7 (
talk) 21:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Citations have been really hard to find. I'll keep working.
Kees08 (
talk) 01:44, 8 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Alright, there are seven more sections that need citations expanded. If we each do about two, we can finish this week! Let's get this thing pushed! I'll work on it later tonight.
Kees08 (
talk) 15:11, 18 July 2016 (UTC)reply
I've done everything down to the "Legacy" section. That's the only one that still needs to be done.
Hawkeye7 (
talk) 08:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Finished up everything past the legacy section. Could you do one final sweep of the article and make sure we addressed everything you wanted? Should be good at this point.
Kees08 (
talk) 07:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Done. Passing article now. Although it has taken a long time, I have articles that have been in the GA queue longer. If you want to take the article to FAC, get back to me first before nominating; it still needs a lot of work to reach that level.
Hawkeye7 (
talk) 21:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)reply