A news item involving Anthony Kennedy was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 6 October 2018.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anthony Kennedy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). United States courts and judges High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. California Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Gerald Ford ( defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gerald Ford, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Gerald FordWikipedia:WikiProject Gerald FordTemplate:WikiProject Gerald FordGerald Ford articles Stanford University Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Stanford University, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Stanford University on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Stanford UniversityWikipedia:WikiProject Stanford UniversityTemplate:WikiProject Stanford UniversityStanford University articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Text at "Personal" indicated solely that he is not related to "Patrick Kennedy," who has a linked Wikipedia article, but was not otherwise identified. Patrick was an obscure Irish immigrant farmer who died at an early age in 1858, notable only because he was the great great grandfather of JFK, Ted, etc. Activist ( talk) 09:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC) reply

I'd argue it is, actually. I went through this article and the kennedy family article to work out of AK was a member or just somebody with the same name. It's a fair assumption to assume he is considering he's reached high office like a lot of them. So how can this be phrased in a way that doesn't sound completely stupid? EditorInTheRye ( talk) 20:24, 7 July 2018 (UTC) reply

To add to article: information about Kennedy's children. 76.189.141.37 ( talk) 04:15, 30 June 2018 (UTC) reply

I have included two sentences about this. It is a part of the dialog and potential legacy of Justice Kennedy despite there being no concrete proof to validate it. In particular, the focus on the German bank handling Trump's finances seems to be fueled at least in part due to the link to Kennedy's son. -Diego Drowning — Preceding unsigned comment added by DiegoDrowning ( talk • contribs) 19:03, 12 November 2018 (UTC) reply

DiegoDrowning, it doesn't look like those sources actually support your text. One of them says that the allegations are dubious at best. I'm reverting for now as this is a BLP and we need something more than mere speculation to include such allegations. zchrykng ( talk) 19:18, 12 November 2018 (UTC) reply

I fundamentally disagree. BLP does not disaffect 'speculation' when the speculation is a significant article of public discourse. I am happy to change the WORDING of the article in question but your simple revert appears to be WP:Bad Faith. This 'rumor' has been a significant portion of political dialog and will remain a portion of Kennedy's legacy. The secondary paragraph indicates that the german bank is being investigate in 2019 and yet I challenge you to find sources talking about it prior to July 2018. The added paragraph does not validate the rumors, it simply states their weight in the ongoing political narrative. Kind of sad really. DiegoDrowning ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:26, 12 November 2018 (UTC) reply

DiegoDrowning, if there is a good reason to include the text, lets hammer it out here before adding a potentially controversial text block to a BLP. Also, I recommend you assume good faith, it helps working with other people go much more smoothly. I'm not going to try blocking all additions of something similar, but I want the sources and language to be bullet proof. zchrykng ( talk) 19:48, 12 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Five primary sources from five alpha level reliability websites is pretty damn bullet proof. DiegoDrowning ( talk) 19:52, 12 November 2018 (UTC) reply

DiegoDrowning, I'm not sure what you mean by "alpha level reliability websites", but we appear to have differing opinions on what the sources in question say and the standards of what is required for BLPs. Let us wait and see what others have to say on the matter. zchrykng ( talk) 20:09, 12 November 2018 (UTC) reply

i don't want to require a source for this claim but what was his status upon discharge after serving only one year? national guard has never had one year contracts, even for direct commission officers, and this entry is vague as to the exact length of service with no rank provided. was this a civilian employee position, enlisted soldier, or commissioned officer?

4th paragraph under “Personal Life” has confused financier Gregory Kennedy with former Supreme Court justice Anthony Kennedy (whom the article is about). The first citation regarding the Federalist Society is accurate for Anthony Kennedy, but the remaining content seems to solely be about Gregory Kennedy. 2402:7500:5D7:72B9:8085:DFFE:C594:6196 ( talk) 01:31, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply