 | This 
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Kagabler. Peer reviewers:
Kagabler.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 17:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 August 2021 and 17 December 2021. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
CJTheReader.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 17:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on American chestnut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://greenxc.com/2011/american-chestnut-restoration-breakthrough-tale-tree/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151001124503/http://www.tappanchairs.com/the-american-chestnut-foundation-chair.html to http://www.tappanchairs.com/the-american-chestnut-foundation-chair.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071009184101/http://www.acffarms.org/papers/Chestnut%20Range%20Map%20modern.jpg to http://www.acffarms.org/papers/Chestnut%20Range%20Map%20modern.jpg
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:22, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
This article could use an update in regards to the extent that the chestnut was intensively cultivated by native peoples, who likely expanded its range as well as its population. It was the basis of large scale nut agroforestry that further fed game species like bear, turkey, and deer. The use of fire to manage these forests and increase nut production is well documented. See "1491" by Charles Mann. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FLufkin ( talk • contribs) 18:27, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
It would be helpful if there is a photo of a wooden plank of the chestnut tree. Maybe some furniture would also add more information to the article.-- Giftzwerg 88 ( talk) 18:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- It sure would be interesting to a lot of woodworkers who have never seen Chestnut. Blueistrue ( talk) 14:36, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
What is the purpose of the word "alone" in this sentence?
- In Pennsylvania alone, it is estimated to have comprised 25–30% of all hardwoods.
It sounds as if it is trying to say:
- In Pennsylvania alone, it is estimated to have comprised 25–30% of all hardwoods [growing on the Eastern Seaboard].
Instead, what it probably is intended to say is simply:
- In Pennsylvania [for example], it is estimated to have comprised 25–30% of all hardwoods.
Or it could just be removed. Blueistrue ( talk) 14:33, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
I have removed the recently added section about intellectual property. This material was off topic. There are other articles in wikipedia where this topic can be more properly addressed. sbelknap ( talk) 23:44, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Second paragraph first sentence the disease is a fungus. Third paragraph second sentence it is called a virus. It can't be both. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bruce A. WIlliamson ( talk • contribs) 15:05, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
- Worse that was in the lede section. I have corrected it. Invasive Spices ( talk) 20 January 2022 (UTC)
I removed some edits which appear to be vandalism. Based on the citations, the Darling 58 work is clearly the leading effort to restore the American Chestnut. Currently, the other projects have been less successful. sbelknap ( talk) 18:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Summary links chinese chestnut, but blight section links japanese chestnut 2603:6011:B522:6355:20DF:215F:AD99:F7E ( talk) 10:36, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
They found a lone tree in Maine that’s 115 ft so if this random one is 115 the max is likely higher
https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2015/12/17/459203467/in-the-maine-woods-a-towering-giant-could-help-save-chesnuts 216.49.139.3 ( talk) 00:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- C-Class plant articles
- High-importance plant articles
- WikiProject Plants articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject United States articles