This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Companies Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{ portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{ WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Journalism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Newspapers Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Louisville / North Carolina / Charlotte Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Louisville (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina - Charlotte (assessed as Low-importance).

Individual journal articles being considered for deletion here. Improbcat 16:07, 25 July 2007 (UTC) reply

There are a serious of minor break off articles from this article which were discussed for deletion. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Business_Review. There was no consensus to delete or keep. In cases like this the best option is a merge because then the information is kept in the appropriate place, and it builds the main article. A merge is not a deletion. The material remains. And a search for the material finds it directly if the redirect uses the right coding (#). There was some growing support for a merge. Notice being posted to allow for any opposition to a merge to be raised. SilkTork *** SilkyTalk 13:47, 24 August 2007 (UTC) reply

I'm opposed to merge of Business First in particular due to reasons I stated in the Afd. The article is a stub today, but that's only because it's still new and hasn't been expanded yet. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 14:30, 24 August 2007 (UTC) reply

You objected to the article being deleted. This is not a deletion. The article will remain. It will be in a situation where it will get more not less traffic. It is a move from an isolated location to a supported location. If/when it grows beyond a couple of paragraphs is the time for it to become a stand alone article. I've merged Memphis Business Journal as an example to show you how it works. SilkTork *** SilkyTalk 15:55, 24 August 2007 (UTC) reply

I"m opposed to the merge of this article. It's already fairly long. It's where a number of pages have been merged and represents a logical grouping of these kinds of publications.-- Rtphokie ( talk) 12:41, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply

This has been removed as per WP:NLIST - list of notable persons. Mt king ^(edits) 03:19, 18 September 2011 (UTC) reply

The article Chicago Business Journal redirects here, but it is not listed in the table under Newspapers section. Does American City Business Journals own the Chicago Business Journal, or is it a faulty link? — 67.180.24.57 ( talk) 20:22, 16 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Nevermind. I found the answer here and added it to the list. — 67.180.24.57 ( talk) 20:28, 16 July 2013 (UTC) reply

See:

• Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 288#Business Journals / bizjournals.com

The consensus was these publications (except for clearly marked sponsored articles) are very reliable. -- A. B. ^{( talk • contribs • global count)} 04:34, 29 June 2023 (UTC) reply

I am not editing this article directly as I have a COI in that I work directly for ACBJ.

That said --

(1) Under external links, the article has https://www.thebizjournals.com/ but that is not owned by ACBJ. The link should be https://www.bizjournals.com To us this is a pretty big error.

(2) Under City business publications:

We do not own the following --

• Bellingham Business Journal
• Hartford Business Journal

(3) Many of these publications do not have wikipedia pages (Atlanta Business Chronicle for example) yet some do like Jacksonville Business Journal

(4) We no longer own Inside Lacrosse.

(5) Cleveland, Chicago, New York, Providence and LA are all online-only. Also, Providence is new. DrobertsACBJ ( talk) 16:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I have fixed the link and will take a look at the other suggested changes later today. Eric Schucht ( talk) 17:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply