From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Since and even before COVID 311 has become a pivotal part of the democratic process in Albuquerque https://www.krqe.com/news/albuquerque-metro/311-call-center-committed-to-improving-caller-experiences/amp/ https://www.krqe.com/health/coronavirus-new-mexico/mayor-keller-city-officials-to-provide-update-on-local-albuquerque-coronavirus-response/amp/

NebuLogic Technologies developed this 311 system http://support.nebulogic.com/website/index.php/works/city-of-albuquerque-nm/

Etymology?

What happened to the section on Etymology? That’s a rhetorical question as I know what happened. Five years ago, it was correct with “reputable” source citations; and then someone messed with it… and then someone else… and then someone else until it was so “wrong”, it was deleted altogether. As a result, the current minimalist section on the founding and naming of the outpost and eventual town is relegated to “a Duke” and a “town in Spain”. And the only citation is the “historical foundation”; typically defined as a social club of retirees who read a couple of books and were born and raised there. That is not a reputable source citation. I’m not from New Mexico and frankly this kind of amateurish history is driving me away from Wikipedia but someone who cares should care more. It’s embarrassing. 72.218.205.71 ( talk) 00:23, 12 February 2022 (UTC) reply

East high high school

Spanish 2600:6C56:4800:23C8:E036:C9F5:AA7E:C6DA ( talk) 11:58, 26 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Religious groups

Check the 2 parts/sections about religious groups - both are described as "the second largest" and that is not possible. If it is meant to be described as the Abrahamitic religions it needs to be clarified. 83.248.75.122 ( talk) 08:46, 9 August 2022 (UTC) reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 14:39, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Could we move to just "Albuquerque"?

I know proposals have been attempted before, but could we move to just Albuquerque? I personally think It's a good idea. GabrielPenn4223 ( talk) 14:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Seeing as you already had an answer to this question at WP:TEAHOUSE, I think you know how a request for a page move will go. I would personally oppose such a move given WP:USPLACE. GSK ( talkedits) 14:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC) reply
95% of the users in a move poll from a US place with state to US place without state would oppose it. GabrielPenn4223 ( talk) 15:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC) reply
If you're confident about those statistics, then why make the request at all? GSK ( talkedits) 15:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC) reply
What poll?
2601:204:EA7F:220:55C3:5205:DF34:5E4 ( talk) 06:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The redirect Sunset Ranch, New Mexico has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 14 § Sunset Ranch, New Mexico until a consensus is reached. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:35, 14 February 2024 (UTC) reply