From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Slave count

The number of slaves is missing both here and in History of Alabama. Important to discussing the war. Availability of manpower. Student7 ( talk) 14:54, 26 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Proposed merger (redirect of "Alabama Republic" to this article)

  • Support merger by redirect of Alabama Republic to this article. The article distills down to a paragraph about the secession flag with the only pertinent reference being to a description in Alabama archives: "This flag has often been referred to as the Republic of Alabama Flag." That is the extent of the working cites. The flag image and description could be included here without any loss of verifiable content. The "Republic" name doesn't appear to be supported by reliable sources. Red Harvest ( talk) 01:54, 5 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Support -- good argument. Rjensen ( talk) 03:08, 5 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Merge to this target. Content fork of subject. BusterD ( talk) 04:34, 5 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Merge to this article. No need for a separate Alabama Republic article; any pertinent info about that could, and should, be included here. - Ecjmartin ( talk) 03:31, 6 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Note the "Alabama Republic" article has been nominated for deletion by another user. I therefore update my position to support deletion with possible redirect as the basis for "Republic" is speculative as are others in the "series." See Article for Deletion discussion: Alabama Republic Red Harvest ( talk) 06:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC) reply

This discussion should be closed since the AfD discussion resulted in elimination of the page. Red Harvest ( talk) 07:02, 29 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Poorly Written and Cited

This article is poorly written and in bad need of cites. There are/were several sections (I removed the ones that did not cite any thing) that had no cites whatsoever...recommend total rewrite with scholarly cites and less partisanship towards Unionists...

I agree. Through the article only one sample of each source in favor of slavery was cited. For example they only say one politician supported secession in the support of slavery. What about the others. I would note the politicians cited was not even the governor. The governor is the one that speaks to what the people of his state were thinking in taking a particular act. What statements did Alabama's governor make? There are records of what Alabama's other politicians were saying at the time.

They cite only one newspaper at the time. What about the other newspapers at the time this happened? Does the If the LA Times were to speak against rights for immigrants does the LA Times speak for all the newspapers in California???

Without additional sources this article is nothing more than hit piece whose only purpose is to stir up racial hatred toward "white" Americans. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1012:B004:89F7:A041:8F26:6BEF:EDAA ( talk) 00:28, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Alabama in the American Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 04:39, 29 March 2016 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Alabama in the American Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:56, 5 May 2017 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Alabama in the American Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:38, 29 June 2017 (UTC) reply