This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to
animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can
the article attached to this page, help out with the
open tasks, or contribute to the
discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Almost the same, if I'm reading it right: they're the same program but different versions, and the very old version isn't central to
Adobe Flash Professional. I'm guessing that if they get merged, eventually that article will be rewritten to focus on the software as it is rather than its ancient history, and people who are looking for FutureSplash will get a redirect to nothing useful. Ideally, that wouldn't happen, as anyone doing a substantial rewrite would check the what-links-here and either split the material back out or give it a section heading for the redirect to point to. But really I'm guessing it would happen. --
Dan Wylie-Sears 2 (
talk) 04:39, 19 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Needs More Information
I found the article fairly short. I would suggest to add more information about the use of Animate CC.
Particularly in the descriptions of the last two releases (AA 2018 and 2019), the text reads like advertising copy; not at all like an encyclopaedia! e.g. "Our machine learning platform makes it happen automatically."Our?
The entire article may present an unbalanced picture of the capabilities of AA, rather than what Wikipedia prefers: a neutral Point of View (NPOV).