This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Linguistics Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Literature Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Someone needs to fix the IPA transcription for the pronunciation. It is incorrect.

I've removed this from the page as it is a unreferenced redlink which recieves 0 Google hits. Blackcap (talk) 17:50, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply

"Famous adages from roman times:

   * Ad altentium fur mein: Owned and owned hard."

What does "Owned and owned hard" mean? Is this a joke? -- 219.89.33.39 15:06, 15 July 2006 (UTC) reply

-- Otij 04:20, 7 October 2007 (UTC) reply

for the accuracy , to help french users or other people willing to learn it and not to misunderstand the word Adage with Proverbe ; the french link should point to : http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adage or http://fr.wiktionary.org/wiki/adage . Words are like animals and plants they tend to desapear from a language nowadays. I mean this word is not much used ; and leaving the link as it is helps the extinction .

when you type a search in the //fr.wikipedia.org for adage you are redirected to http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adage and not http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proverbe .

also you can notice that the persons who edited,forged the french page for the word proverbe forgot in her/his list the word adage.

-Voir aussi (see also) : aphorisme | dicton | locution | citations| Proverbes (théâtre)

boring see lmfao its less boring than this — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.58.129.234 ( talk) 15:34, 4 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Does it seem odd to anyone else that there are 2 examples in the main body of the article, and then there is another examples section with further examples? To me it would make more sense to either:

• Only have examples in the main body of the article
• Only have examples in the example section
• Include some examples in the main body of the article and include a more comprehensive list at the end.

Personally I prefer that last option but how many would be listed? will there be so many that the article will be too long? Hintswen  Talk |  Contribs  05:37, 19 January 2010 (UTC) reply