This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our
project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our
talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
I've removed the references here because they were copied blindly from Smith. This is not necessarily a bad thing, but when the person who copies doesn't bother to check the references, there can be errors, as in this case (references to Juvenalius vi 75 instead of iii115).
Ori Redler 15:52, 1 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Weird. All those removed references were fine; therefore the only "correction" made — other than wholesale deletions of good refs — is wrong ("iii115"; IV.75 was right). Also, "Juvenalius" is hardly Juvenal's Latin name. This is a perfect example of Wikipedia dummification. Someone put up the Smith's article, which is good, and with several good references to the primary sources — and by the miracle of editing, most of the refs have been removed, and the one remaining one has been at the mercy, at least once, and doubtless again, of a misguided editor.
Bill 01:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Abolla. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.