This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{ portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{ WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments California: Los Angeles Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance). Energy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Engineering Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

According to the company's website Mr. Richard G. Newman is the Chairman of the company (see http://investors.aecom.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=131318&p=irol-govBoard).

Mr. Kozonis, whose name was put in place of Newman's in a previous edit, has as far as I can see nothing to do with the company. So I restore the article to its previous form. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Geertz03 ( talk • contribs) 04:16, 3 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Much of this article is unsourced; either the information is conjecture or unverifiable -- and thus at odds with basic Wikipedia guidelines. Parts of the article are highly promotional and written like an advertisement. 842U ( talk) 17:46, 4 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Concur. Zezen ( talk) 07:19, 13 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Self-sourced (press release) info has been removed from this article by three Wikipedia editors (including myself) but has been reverted on each occasion by Ekr219. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and should include only notable information from independent, reliable sources. Businesses regularly issue press releases and not all are picked up and used by newspapers, either because there is no interest or they are not notable. I would be grateful if Ekr219 would stop reverting edits and only add information that is cited from independent, reliable sources. Sionk ( talk) 23:18, 28 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi. Can you let me know exactly why you are reverting my edits on the page? Any detailed information you can provide would be great as I obviously keep getting in "trouble" from you for my edits. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekr219 ( talk • contribs) 19:59, 13 January 2012‎

From your comment on my Talk page I guess you understand the problem now and you appreciate that anything added to Wikipedia should be properly sourced and encyclopaedic. Thankyou for making contact. You speak in the 2nd person plural, as in "Our communications are frequently picked up by top-tier media outlets" - are you acting on behalf of AECOM? Sionk ( talk) 22:27, 13 January 2012 (UTC) reply

I hate this article.

To me, it represents the perfect example of what we SHOULDN'T be doing here. It's not just written like an advert, it IS one.

Someone who knows this company needs to clean this up or just get rid of the article. -- Connelly90 23:55, 15 March 2015 (UTC) reply

To be honest I've seen worse. Being an article about a very major company it will almost certainly never be deleted. But I agree, there have been several very obvious attempts to add publicity material. I'm not sure the "advert" template is needed any more, because the advert-y stuff has largely been removed. Sionk ( talk) 18:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC) reply

Concur. I will fix it now. Zezen ( talk) 07:18, 13 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on AECOM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140506184736/http://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/aecom-reports-secondquarter-fiscal-year-2014-results-20140506-00244 to http://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/aecom-reports-secondquarter-fiscal-year-2014-results-20140506-00244

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— ^{cyberbot II} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:38, 17 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AECOM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150204092641/http://aecom.com/What+We+Do/Program+Cost+Consultancy to http://www.aecom.com/What+We+Do/Program+Cost+Consultancy

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:29, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The request was not specific enough. You may consider leaving your comments on the Talk page or escalating significant issues to the conflict of interest noticeboard.

The claim of awards could do with a check

from waht i can establish the references is unclear as to the "global"

the article is called "top 500 design firms", unclear if it is global from the heading.

2nd obsertvation, from a check of these 500 design companies, 500 appears to be listed as based in different american states and cities? i.e. POV is top american design companies?  however canadian/american WSP is listed as "american", PCI skanska is swedish...so a little unclear

Odebrecht is for example missing, perhaps some of the asian and middle eastern are also missing? Considering the talk history of the aecom article it might be that the awards are of still suffering from PR

 Declined I don't see a specific request for what is proposed to be either removed or added to the article. For example:

Proposal

Current Text	Replace with
In 2008, the Prime Minister remarked that he would not leave office.	The Prime Minister left office in 2008.

Please advise.

:  Spintendo   ᔦᔭ  04:51, 6 December 2017 (UTC) reply

This article does not mention Albert Dorman who, according to other sources played a significant, if not vital role, in the corporation's founding & deverlopment,e.g ^[1]

It was painful to read. I pruned the most blatant examples. As a test I left such bits:

As of March 3, 2019, key leaders of AECOM are as follows:[22]

Michael Burke, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Daniel Tishman, Vice Chairman and Chairman of Tishman Construction Corporation
Randall Wotring...

which seem to have been inserted by an internal PR trainee. Zezen ( talk) 07:34, 13 June 2019 (UTC) reply

This is how I found out about this company: https://publicintegrity.org/business/taxes/trumps-tax-cuts/you-paid-taxes-these-corporations-didnt/

Shall we mention here these negative Federal taxes:

AECOM Technology	$238	–122	–51%

? It would help balance the still existing POV slant of this article. Zezen ( talk) 07:40, 13 June 2019 (UTC) reply

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 November 2022 and 16 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): DagenM ( article contribs). Peer reviewers: Samson 34343434.

— Assignment last updated by Stephlong1 ( talk) 19:03, 30 November 2022 (UTC) reply

.. 2A02:2F0B:950E:4400:F59A:5134:376D:FB6C ( talk) 12:54, 23 November 2022 (UTC) reply

?? 2A02:2F0B:950E:4400:F59A:5134:376D:FB6C ( talk) 12:55, 23 November 2022 (UTC) reply