This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I came to this page from Category:Articles with incorrect citation syntax. In future, please do complete citations so that I and others don't have to clean-up after you.
But, my real point is that I don't think that § Fallen soldiers should be included in this article. Wikipedia is not a collection of all facts and, to be blunt, these fallen soldiers are just facts. Memories of them are best preserved elsewhere. Similarly, § Gallery has recently grown with the addition of images that may not be encyclopedic in nature. See WP:Galleries.
I propose to delete §Fallen soldiers (known).
— Trappist the monk ( talk) 17:52, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
I oppose the deletion of the Fallen Soldiers section. History is a collection of facts, and Wikipedia works to collect the most important ones. The deaths, in combat, of each Soldier mentioned was reported in reputable and verifiable news sources around the United States and records pertaining to them are maintained in perpetuity by the Department of Defense. All but one of the known killed are from modern conflicts where the minimalization of US casualties has been a driving strategic paradigm (ex: see the development of the MRAP class of military vehicles). The listing of fallen Soldiers goes a tremendous distance in understanding the unit's contributions and service and thus should be kept in the article. That articles about other units do not include such information should, under no circumstances, be grounds for its removal. It only shows that the appropriate legwork of posting it has not yet been competed. WIKI1Q2W3E4R ( talk) 11:13, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
9th Engineer Battalion (United States). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:34, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
9th Engineer Battalion (United States). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 17:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 9th Engineer Battalion (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.same.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=257&Itemid=83When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:48, 23 June 2017 (UTC)