This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Canadian / North America This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Canadian military history task force North American military history task force Canada Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Hi @ Werieth. I have a question about your removal of the badges from the bottom of the page a few days ago. Presumably the set of badge images could never fit Wikipedia:NFCC#8 or not without significant commentary about them being added (which seems unlikely). This wasn't just an issue with them being deleted from the commons and moved back to en, so adding a free-use rational won't help because of NFCC#8? Cheers-- Otus scops ( talk) 23:14, 28 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Basically. Since the files are labeled as non-free vs the old free status, they are under a completely different set of usage rules. Those rules really restrict what can be used. In this case the badges dont meet those requirements. Werieth ( talk) 23:20, 28 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks. I think I understand, but could I just confirm - when you say "the badges dont meet those requirements", presumably you mean "a non-free use rational could not be written for them that would satisfy their non-free use in the way that they were being used in this article"?-- Otus scops ( talk) 23:31, 28 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 3 Canadian Forces Flying Training School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070203002804/http://www.airforce.forces.gc.ca/17wing/squadron/3cffts_e.asp to http://www.airforce.forces.gc.ca/17wing/squadron/3cffts_e.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:16, 22 June 2017 (UTC) reply