This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Numbers This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumbersWikipedia:WikiProject NumbersTemplate:WikiProject NumbersNumbers articles

This page was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on November, 30 2009. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Alex Bellos mentioned that 219 used to be the lowest whole number "too boring" to have its own Wikipedia page. [1]. Also see Talk:224_(number). — tbc ( talk) 20:12, 1 January 2015 (UTC) reply