From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

Need assistance constructing and finding sources for this article.

May help find sources - we've stood up a Ushahidi instance @ http://mightymoriver.crowdmap.com/ - update reports as time permits - news feed at lower right (more current), &/or @ http://feeds.feedburner.com/MissourisSharedItemsInGoogleReader?format=xml. The reports feed (less current, more of a manual process) is http://mightymoriver.crowdmap.com/feed/. Aghilmort Tromlihga 03:26, 23 June 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aghilmort ( talkcontribs)

Dam flows

The source for dam flows we should probably be consistent. The Corps of Engineers River Watch http://us.vocuspr.com/Publish/520028/PRAssetNWORiverwatch.xml is giving the flows that I used initially in the table (a .pdf report published each day). There was an addition today saying Gavins is 150,030. I found a news item on it but it is not in the Corps report. Americasroof ( talk) 20:16, 21 June 2011 (UTC) reply

You are correct...I noticed that the pdf daily info had stated on the 19th that the Gavins Point Dam was flowing at 150,300 but all flow rates are estimates only. I see you have now added that it is to go to 160,000 which I read was to happen by June 23rd.-- MONGO 10:57, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
I see you've found two images of the nuclear power plants in Nebraska and concur with your editing comments...access is always restricted to outsiders to these facilities and the closest I was able to get to Fort Calhoun on Sunday (June 19th) was the main road...the flooding is now worse than in those June 16th images...-- MONGO 11:11, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Thank you for your comments. And BIG THANKS for your photos. You have quite an impressive collection! Americasroof ( talk) 14:22, 23 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Nuclear diaster news blackout

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-mjnwuXMxg 98.24.154.187 ( talk) 14:03, 25 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Update needed

Reasons for tags being added:

  • The verbiage is often in present tense.
  • The information on record water releases are not current. For example, Gavins Point exceeded 160,000 cfs.
  • The information presented stops at a certain point.
  • There could be some commentary on national impact.
  • There could be some information concerning how the levees actually performed in this event. Specifically, the levees were not designed for long-term high water.
  • Have there been any legal issues?
  • Relevance to the 2011 Mississippi flooding
  • etc.

Don'tKnowItAtAll ( talk) 13:30, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 31 external links on 2011 Missouri River Flood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:11, 26 February 2016 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2011 Missouri River Flood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:10, 22 May 2017 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 2011 Missouri River Flood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:09, 19 June 2017 (UTC) reply