@
Z105space: - I am gong to start the GA review of this today, I usually add comments over a day or two while I look at all aspects of the GA criteria. If you have any questions etc. along the way feel free to let me know.
MPJ-DK 23:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)reply
External sources - the link to indycar.com is dead according to the tool N
Meets the broad in coverage - it has what you'd expect for an article on a race, ensuring that it also covers the context of the race, not just the results Y
Stability - Not detecting any issues on the talk page or the article history Y
Lead
"(including its three years" - the word "its" should be removed.
"CCWS" is used as an abbreviation - while it is spelled out in the lead the lead should be considered separate from the main body of the article so the first time an abbreviation is used it should be spelled out.
I believe this sentence "by teammate Castroneves and had the pole" should be worded slightly different, if I read it correctly you means "by teammate Castroneves who had the pole" otherwise the "and" refers back to Powers, which we've already established.
"After starting fifteenth, Tracy drove aggressively and moved up into tenth position by the 20th lap." either all spelled out or not, I don't have a preference for which way you go.
I will keep it the way it is. 16:02, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Is there some sort of link for "Green-Flag" and what it means in racing?
Linked it to Racing flags#Green flag
"pit box to repair damage" I find the sentence "to repair damage" kinda odd, missing something?
"The move was immediately reviewed by the IndyCar chief steward and competition president Brian Barnhart and Castroneves was shown a black-flag one minute later after Barnhardt judged that he blocked Power." How about
"The move was immediately reviewed by the IndyCar chief steward and competition president Brian Barnhart, which led to Castroneves being shown a black-flag one minute later as he was deemed as having blocked Power."? the original sentence reads a little dense.
Similarities were made between Castroneves'" - either "comparisons were made" or "similarities were noted or something like that" - cannot make a similarity.
Just a source review is all that remains and my review will be complete. Sorry it has taken so long, I have been suffering from bad allergies that made it hard to focus.
Source review
Flagworld.com - I am not famliar with it, is it considered a reliable source for racing?
The rest look like they are reliable, well formatted etc.
@
MWright96: - that's my completed review, I will put it on hold for up to 7 days to allow for you to address the minor issues I have found.
MPJ-DK 15:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)reply
@
MPJ-DK: Many thanks for the review. I have acted on all the points you've raised.
MWright96(talk) 16:02, 17 September 2016 (UTC)reply
@
MWright96: - I am satisfied this is a Good Aricle. Contrats