This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Conservatism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I've just started this article. It has much room for improvement. I added the conservatism template as reflecting modern conservatism's idea of free-markets and privatization. Although classical liberalism also would support this. -- Northmeister 05:35, 16 April 2006 (UTC) reply

It would be usefull to seperate the actual links from the main text by using the Wiki mormative format. Is the link to the article on school privitizations really relevant to this topic? -- Levraitong 17:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC) reply

The title of this article is hopelessly broad. As written, the article relates solely to a 2004 conference at Middlebury, Vermont: nothing more. No doubt additional material could be added, but as it stands the title makes litle sense and I'm proposing to move the page to something more sensible. MichaelMaggs ( talk) 16:50, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply