This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the
discussion and see a list of
open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
This article lacks sufficient
references and adequate
inline citations. Once the references are added, please remove the |unref= parameter from this template.
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be
added to this article.
Daily page views
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on
Phabricator and on
MediaWiki.org.
Performance, Ed Sanow, and References
Has anyone read the reference??? (
http://www.firearmstactical.com/pdf/sanow.pdf) It's a complete critique of Sanow suggesting a strong conflict of interest and outright bad information. Furthermore, the reference doesn't address the performance of the .32NAA ammunition at all.
In addition, the section says .32NAA outperforms
.380 ACP in energy when, to the contrary, the .380 article lists three types that exceed the 199 ft-lbs. I'm striking the entire sentence and we can reinsert a properly researched/referenced statement.
MartinezMD (
talk) 06:59, 14 December 2011 (UTC)reply