This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms Start‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Writing systems Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Iceland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iceland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iceland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IcelandWikipedia:WikiProject IcelandTemplate:WikiProject IcelandIceland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Faroe Islands Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Faroe Islands, a WikiProject related to the nation of Faroe Islands. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Faroe IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject Faroe IslandsTemplate:WikiProject Faroe IslandsFaroe Islands articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Denmark Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Norway This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

Archives

1

@ Drmccreedy: Why did you add the character æ̀ in this edit? It isn't in Unicode. Is it used in some language? — Eru· tuon 01:02, 6 July 2017 (UTC) reply

I added it because it's one of Unicode's official named sequences ( [1]). I'm not sure which languages use it but it seems to be from the Japanese standard JIS X 0213. Thank you so much for asking the question instead of automatically reverting my edit. DRMcCreedy ( talk) 03:52, 6 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Does anyone know the origin of the grapheme? I wonder if the Christian missionaries to the English invented it to record a sound between /a/ and /e/, which they did not have in Latin, or if it already existed? Snugglepuss ( talk) 18:46, 17 October 2018 (UTC) reply

What about Ae, joined, in "title case"? So it begins a titled word like Aeschylus? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:9DE1:1260:F887:AE5A:B1B:1E29 ( talk) 03:41, 30 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Late reply: This ligature only exists in uppercase or lowercase; where it begins a proper noun, or most words in title case, it's all uppercase: Æschylus, Æneas, Æthelwulf. Typographically it's treated as a single letter, even though one can choose to transliterate it as two separate letters, in which case only the 'A' would be in uppercase. P Aculeius ( talk) 13:03, 27 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Was there any difference in early modern books in the use of ash when writing titles in upper or lower case? 82.37.67.151 ( talk) 13:24, 4 November 2022 (UTC) reply

No, most early 18th–20th century books write it as "Æschylus". ―  Ö S M A N  ( talk · contribs) 12:14, 22 September 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Aelig. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 3#Aelig until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 09:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC) reply

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ææ and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 10#Ææ until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 ( talk) 14:37, 10 August 2022 (UTC) reply

thinking it might be worth mentioning as a pop culture remark. Thoughts?

X Æ A-12 Electricmaster ( talk) 10:52, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

What where they thinking?

I hope she change her name as an adult to something much more nice and simple. Whozilla ( talk) 18:04, 26 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The article claims that Æ was called æsc in Old English, but the supporting source actually just says that the rune transliterated as æ was named æsc. This is not the same thing as the Latin character being called æsc. It's true that Þ and Ƿ inherited runic names, but unlike Þ and Ƿ, Æ wasn't originally a rune, so it might not be safe to assume it inherited a runic name. A real source for the claim should be found, or the claim should be taken out of the article. Hurlebatte ( talk) 15:58, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply