This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
60 activists?
I can think of lots of Irish groups with hundreds of members who wouldn't qualify for wikipedia on the grounds of notability. Shouldn't it be Workers' and not Workers?
86.42.219.131 (
talk) 05:25, 27 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Hope this helps,
Skomorokh 05:56, 27 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Criticism section
An anonymous editor keeps re-inserting the claim that one of WSM's members was treated in a mental hospital. Before this information goes back in again, I'd be interested in knowing the editor's source for this, as well as a reason why this should be considered notable information, or included in the "Criticism" section. -
Father Inire (
talk) 11:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC)reply
The frequent reverts of and by this particularly persistent anon make up the bulk of this article's edit history. I propose we have it semi-protected for a while.
Lapsed Pacifist (
talk) 19:14, 25 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Second, can you get this proposed / enacted?
Fifelfoo (
talk) 22:47, 25 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Third. Apart from anything else, I'd like to hear a non-ableist rationale for why the fact of anarchists being human beings existing in a society rife with oppression and contradictions and therefore prone like other human beings in such a society to struggling with their health should be considered a "criticism".
86.168.119.34 (
talk) 04:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)reply
