Thanks, that's a big improvement.VRtalk 21:28, 20 June 2022 (UTC)reply
There is no discussion on the political dimension. I know Turkey has a loud democracy. Has most of this progress occurred during AKP era? How does the opposition feel about this?
Whilst the price of electricity is indeed a hot political topic (covered in another article), and some academics argue that more wind power would reduce the price, there is no political debate either for or against wind farms as such
Chidgk1 (
talk) 08:29, 13 June 2022 (UTC)reply
What is the public opinion on wind farms? Are farmers upset?
Not much public opinion either way as far as I can tell - added a couple of sentences - farmers more relevant to other types of generation (e.g. solar agrivoltaics) as hilltops not important for farming - I hope to improve
agriculture in Turkey some time later
Chidgk1 (
talk) 09:05, 13 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Added a sentence but I think the UK article has too much tabular info which would be better held in Wikidata. The only "Wind power in ...." article I can find rated good is
Wind power in South Australia but that was assessed in 2007 when there were far fewer wind farms so I doubt I can use that as a model. However if I do come across anything notable about an individual wind farm I will add it.
Chidgk1 (
talk) 11:02, 13 June 2022 (UTC)reply
The article is currently short, even shorter than narrow topic engineering GAs like
Concrete bus shelters in Canberra and
Rail transport in Vatican City. I would very much prefer more details about actual wind plants in Turkey. But if you disagree, I can continue with the rest of the review and seek a second opinion on this particular topic.VRtalk 21:28, 20 June 2022 (UTC)reply
On second thoughts as there are only 7 wind farms in
Category:Wind_farms_in_Turkey I could excerpt their leads thus avoiding duplicate text - and if their leads are not good quality you can tell me and I could improve them. Would you be happy with that?
Chidgk1 (
talk) 06:54, 22 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Yes, as long as the excerpts were of good quality.VRtalk 16:48, 24 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Another thing: I would organize the "Current and planned capacity" into three parts: the first part should be about current capacity, second part (in a subsection) should be about planned wind plants or those under construction, and final part can be about total potential that can theoretically be achieved.VRtalk 21:28, 20 June 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Vice regent: I hope you are well - do I need to do anything else please?
Chidgk1 (
talk) 13:09, 26 July 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Vice regent: Have requested new reviewer - but if you become available will be happy for you to continue - thanks for your very valuable comments - which have improved the article a lot
Chidgk1 (
talk) 06:01, 24 August 2022 (UTC)reply
I think a second pair of eyes might be helpful. I'll give my final comments soon.VRtalk 16:12, 25 August 2022 (UTC)reply
I see someone else is already reviewing it. I will let them take over. Thanks for the all the hard work on this.VRtalk 01:46, 27 August 2022 (UTC)reply