This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cricket umpire lever counter was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 25 June 2011 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Umpire (cricket). The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
The contents of the Golden Bails Award page were merged into Umpire (cricket) on 15 October 2015. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
I purpose merger of Golden Bails Award with this article. As the source article does not have much information. Vigyani ( talk) 09:47, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Support merger I've umpired baseball, softball, football, basketball, and soccer. No award we received would ever qualify for its own article. That would be putting it on a par w the Cy Young Award, or the Lombardi Trophy. Unless there's some divine status acquired by receiving this award, its objective importance is far below that of a revered award. Veryproicelandic ( talk) 02:46, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
I'd be interested to know what others feel should be the level of detail in this page. There is currently very little reference to the Laws of Cricket, and I think this maybe ought to be changed. I'm very happy to add references but don't what the article to become too technical. Another thought is who do we want this page to appeal to primarily. As a Cricket Upire myself I know there are very little online resources for information, and interpretation, on the laws of cricket. Would anybody out there be interested in a page analysing each law bit by bit, and if so shoudl that be under-taken on another page, specifically on the Laws of Cricket? Wisden17
Yeah I think the lists on the page are bit of a waste of space. I realised after I posted the first message that there is a separate page on the Laws of Cricket, although that could do with some major work on it as well. I like your idea about pathways for umpires (would be interesting to do a comparison between countries), and of the fieldcraft of umpires. I'll add some stuff this week on the qualities of umpires and on positiong etc.. The differences between umpires in other sports may be an interesting section, although would another page not be better. The umpire page could have a comparison section added to it.-- Wisden17 14:17, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Thanks dmmaus for removing the lists. I look forward to your additional stuff Wisden17 and I'm happy to add some stuff, and review your contributions - when I've finished my biogs of Aussie umps. MulgaBill 05:01, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
I've reverted the bit about one umpire standing opposite the non-strikers end. Fairly sure the wicket keeper stands there. And there was already a bit about sometines having more than 2 umpires. Kevin 10:22, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Should there be a link to the ICC Elite umpire panel, at least in the "see also" section?-- Alexio 10:57, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
I have reversed Moondyne's deletions, because I think it is relevant to make the point that disability and age need not be barriers to umpiring. I have to admit a bias - I have been the mentor to the lad with cerebral palsy, who's now in his fifth year in our country competition. However, I have deleted a specific name, which is certainly not relevant. MulgaBill 19:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Who created this line? It is quite clear that scorers need to acknowledge every signal made by an umpire, including the dismissal. If the scorers didn't follow this, then the scorebook would look very bare. Anyone else agree with me? Joshthomson ( talk) 11:17, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Apart from arguably being oxymoronic? Does this mean without Hawk-eye, television replays or what other level of 'help'? Bevo74 ( talk) 16:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Umpire (cricket). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:22, 6 December 2017 (UTC)