From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (
talk ·
contribs) 13:34, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
Will take this one. Regards,
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (
talk •
mail) 13:34, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Lead and infobox;
- Other nuclear material was also acquired from the United States under the treaty; only one material?
- This is grammatically correct. ("one material" is not though)
Hawkeye7
(discuss) 09:38, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Conversion missing for "5.4 tonnes", "7.5 tonnes"
- Imperial/US conventional units for fissile materials is metric, so no conversion.
Hawkeye7
(discuss) 09:38, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Section 1;
- Link "Hyde Park Agreement"
- Done
Hawkeye7
(discuss) 09:38, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Please explain its relation with the Quebec Agreement
- "extended both commercial and military cooperation into the post-war period"
Hawkeye7
(discuss) 09:38, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- was not binding -> did not bind
- "was not binding" is correct. See
wikt:binding.
Hawkeye7
(discuss) 09:38, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Link "Field Marshal"
- Done
Hawkeye7
(discuss) 09:38, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- What does "pain of death" mean?
- It's an English legal lemma. It means that the death penalty applies. See
wikt:on pain of
- Modus Vivendi; is this an agreement?
- Y Yes. Added that. See [wikt:modus vivendi]]. Nut here it refers to
a specific agreement.
Hawkeye7
(discuss) 09:38, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
The "Meanwhile" Soviet Union responded
- No, the chronology is correct.
Hawkeye7
(discuss) 09:38, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Link "Bermuda Conference"
- There's no article. It would be a red link.
Hawkeye7
(discuss) 09:38, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- in the Operation Grapple
- Done
Hawkeye7
(discuss) 09:38, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Regards,
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (
talk •
mail) 07:27, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Regards,
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (
talk •
mail) 13:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Section 3;
- by far the most comprehensive; "comprehensive" in which sense? In the size of the agreement or in exchange of technology etc.
- Y Re-worded.
Hawkeye7
(discuss) 20:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- training of personnel; by whom, US or OK or mutual
- Y Mutual. Added.
Hawkeye7
(discuss) 20:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- There are also confidential intelligence matters covered by the agreement -> Confidential intelligence matters were also covered by the agreement
- Done
Hawkeye7
(discuss) 20:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- section 3.1; para 3; What is "HEU"? Never defined in the previous text, please define it on the first mention
- Done
Hawkeye7
(discuss) 20:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Link "Herbert Loper" on the first mention in para 1 of section 3.3
- He already appeared in the previous section.
Hawkeye7
(discuss) 20:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- J.H.B. Macklen -> J. H. B. Macklen; per
MOS:INITIALS
- Done
Hawkeye7
(discuss) 20:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Link Aldermaston
- Done
Hawkeye7
(discuss) 20:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- para 1 of section 3.4; highly enriched uranium (HEU); has been already linked and defined before, dup-link
- Y Removed.
Hawkeye7
(discuss) 20:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- para 1 of section 3.4; tritium; already linked, dup-link
- Y Removed.
Hawkeye7
(discuss) 20:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- conversion for 21.86 tonnes
- Fissile material is always in metric.
Hawkeye7
(discuss) 21:05, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Section 4; all good
- All images OK
-
External links check shows a dead link
- {{tick} Restored from archive.
Hawkeye7
(discuss) 21:05, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Copyvio check
1,
2,
3 shows violation possible, but they are mostly due to quotations. So no issues.
- G'work, nice article. Regards,
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (
talk •
mail) 14:52, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
-
GA review (see
here for what the criteria are, and
here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (
MoS for
lead,
layout,
word choice,
fiction, and
lists):
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (
reference section): b (citations to
reliable sources): c (
OR): d (
copyvio and
plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (
major aspects): b (
focused):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales): b (
appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Regards,
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (
talk •
mail) 15:50, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
reply