This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Isn‘t it better to take the Bahri dynasty, which was a period of Mamluk egypt, then mamluk sultanate as hos whole? Since Bahri family was just Kipchak turkic, and the following was of Caucasian origin.
Wouldn't this be better as a category page? Elm-39 - T/ C 18:25, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
The image File:Ihsan-Abdel-Quddous.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 05:43, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Egyptian Turks was a redirect to Turks in Egypt until Turkmen oglu made it into a duplicate of the original page. There's no reason for this to be a separate page. Ibadibam ( talk) 23:44, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
User:Turkmen oglu 1:26, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
The large illustration on Ottomon or mamluk should be in those separate pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beronzya ( talk • contribs) 22:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)