This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic
Palestine region, the
Palestinian people and the
State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting
the project page, where you can add your name to the
list of members where you can contribute to the
discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
cities,
towns and various other
settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the
Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and
extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for
making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to
make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!
Possible copyvio
The issue of this being a possible copyvio has now been raised on
[1]. -
Mustafaa 06:39, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
section on name
What exactly does "the name was later literalised into Tul Karm" mean? Is anyone prepared to swear to it that "literalise" is really a word? I don't quite understand what it is meant to convey.
Palmiro |
Talk 18:59, 4 March 2006 (UTC)reply
My bloody fault - I used the word given in the source and I didn't look in a dictionary. I thought I understood what they were trying to say (changed from Tur to Tul for literary purposes; i.e. poetic alteration) - but I should have been more careful - I apologize.
Ramallite(talk) 06:06, 5 March 2006 (UTC)reply
I changed it to be even vague. Unfortunately we don't seem to have any authoritative source on the history of the name. --
Zero 00:45, 5 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Ok, I found the following in the Encyclopedia of Islam (which is a professional encyclopedia written by scholars):
Tulkarm is not mentioned by the classical Islamic geographers and travellers, and the first solid mention of it comes from early Mamluk times, when at some time before 663/1264-5 Sultan Baybars divided it equally as ikta`s between two of his amirs, Badr al-Din Basari al-Sharnsi al-Salihi and Badr al-Din Baylik al-Khaznadari. In records from this time and later, the name appears at [typo for "as"?] Tulkarm, possibly from an Aramaic predecessor Tur Karma. From the 10th/16th to the 19th centuries, the Ottoman tapu defteris mention it as a village in the nahiya of Kakun in the liwa of Nabulus. In 995/1548-9, it had 190 households plus three bachelors, but at the end of this century, the number of households had fallen to 156 whilst the numbers of bachelors had increased to 20. There are no references to any mosques or imams at this stage of its history. Of Tulkarm's taxes, one-third was the ruler's khass, and part of the rest went to the upkeep of madrasas outside the town and to the complex of al-zahir Baybars in Cairo. The sources are silent about the town from the 11th/17th to the 19th centuries, except for a reference to a learned Hanbali scholar, Mari b. Yusuf al-Karmi (d. 1033/1623-4) who lived there but who had been born in Jerusalem; a number of his writings survive in manuscript.
Where two dates are given, like "10th/16th", this refers to the Islamic and Western calendars. This source also gives some more recent history that can be used in our article. It cites original sources mostly in Arabic. Note that the "Tur Karma" possible origin is already mentioned in our article, though Zeq maliciously deleted the web source for it. --
Zero 01:14, 5 March 2006 (UTC)reply
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Please add "possibly from an Aramaic predecessor Tur Karma" back into the Etymology section. The web reference mentioned by
Zero0000 above is
[2].
Crash48 (
talk) 14:29, 5 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Done: Per request
BJackJStalk 17:21, 17 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Flag and Seal
Why does it display images of the flag and seal of the declared State of Palestine? Most articles on cities that have images of their flag and seal show it of the city, not the nation in which they reside.
PiMaster3 19:31, 29 May 2006 (UTC)reply
WikiProject Israel (not Judaism)
I added
this template not because Tulkarm is "part of Israel" geographically but because of its present status as the location of IDF checkpoints, a relevant aspect of Israel's involvement in the West Bank. At the same time, I removed the
WP:Judaism template (and left a comment on that Project's talk page) because
the mainspace article at present makes no mention whatsoever of Tulkarm in relation to the
Jewish religion. --
Deborahjay (
talk) 18:40, 1 August 2008 (UTC)"'reply
External links
User 213.6.218.244, on July 22, 2008 at 12:26, added a number of external links that may include duplications. As I don't read
Arabic, I'd appreciate if a knowledgeable editor would check that these are appropriate and aren't redundant. Meanwhile, I
Wikified the listings, including a
section heading, and rewrote the one description to be concise. --
Deborahjay (
talk) 19:07, 1 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Climate section needs editing
In the process of cleaning up the page, I found some overlapping content in the section on
Climate that would benefit by some editing. --
Deborahjay (
talk) 19:09, 1 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Faulty etymology
Once again, Wikipedia disinforms.
The word 'kerem' is Hebrew, not Arabic, and means 'vineyard'. The word 'karim' in Arabic means 'generous'.
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
If the image is
non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --
Huldra (
talk) 18:42, 24 April 2013 (UTC)reply
3 villages
3 (former) villages seem to be a part Tulkaram today. Listing sources for them here:
Shweikah
NB:
Shweikah is now just a redir to Tulkarem.
No article, Tulkarm Governorate, NB loads of places with similar-sounding names, which has been mixed up by the best; proceed with great caution!
HA p137: p3 Suwayki (153/193) 7+ "In 1596, it appeared under the name of Suwayki in the Ottoman
tax registers, in the Nahiyas of
Qaqun of the LiwaNablus. It had a population of 101 households, all Muslim, who paid taxes on wheat, barley, summer crops, olive trees, goats and/or beehives, and a press for olives or grapes."<> Hütteroth and Abdulfattah, 1977, p. 137 <>
Shuweikeh in SWP map 11 (Jm), SWP, II:
153 (=with Guerin, based on Samarie I, p.
204?? or based on Samarie II,
353??) NB: if it is the first , then it same mistake as in the Lubban-articles! From the context in Guerin, it is clear that the first Kh S. is between
Kafr 'Aqab and
al-Bireh, that is on SWP map 17, not 11. The second one is *this* Shweikah. French-speakers needed!
Shuweika in 06JaffaTelAviv.jpg
Shuweikeh in Robinson and Smith, vol 3, 2nd app., p.
129
(Dauphin p. 759 (1536/1942): juts north of the village is Kh Shweikat er-Ras, Guérin, Samarie II,
353: Choueikeh; SWP II, 153: Shuweikeh;
(NB: Typo: the SWP-index-ref to SWP III:404 -> SWP map 25, must be Kh. Shuweikeh SWP map 25 (Jx), See also SWP III, 410) (See also: Suweikat: p. 124; z263 (148/120)
Some modern information in Salem A. Thawaba, Urban Growth of a City Under Siege: Tulkarm, Palestine Over the Past Century, Journal of Planning History 2009 8: 27 (ask if you can't get it).
HA p138: z1 Dannana (154/191) 7+ "In 1596, it appeared under the name of Dannana in the Ottoman
tax registers, in the Nahiyas of
Qaqun of the LiwaNablus. It had a population of 16 households and 3 bachelors, all Muslim, who paid taxes on wheat, barley, summer crops, olive trees, goats and/or beehives."<> Hütteroth and Abdulfattah, 1977, p. 138 <>
Dennabeh on SWP map 11 (Km), SWP II:
159; 06JaffaTelAviv.jpg
(Dauphin p. 761 (1542/1912):Guérin, Samarie II, 354: Dennabeh; SWP II, 159: Dennâbeh
HA p139 Irtah (151/189) 7+ "In 1596, Irtah appeared in the Ottoman
tax registers, in the Nahiyas of Bani Sa'b of the Liwa of
Nablus. It had a population of 43 households, all Muslim, who paid taxes on wheat, barley, summer crops, olive trees, goats and/or beehives, and a press for olives or grapes."<> Hütteroth and Abdulfattah, 1977, p. 139<>
SWP II:164; According to 06JaffaTelAviv.jpg: on the West Bank, by Tulkarem 32.18 N 35.1 E
(Dauphin p. 763 (1518/1889): Guérin, Samarie II,
352: Artah; SWP II,
164: Irtâh; Records, p. 62 (XI Kn 2-9))
Extensive modern information in Salem A. Thawaba, Urban Growth of a City Under Siege: Tulkarm, Palestine Over the Past Century, Journal of Planning History 2009 8: 27 (ask if you can't get it).
I have just modified 5 external links on
Tulkarm. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
There are two different Amad ed Din on SWP map 11, both apparently with significant
Maqams.
The first is just north of
Nablus, between Nablus and
Asira ash-Shamaliya. This one is described in SWP II, pp.
170,
218,
220
According to the index, all these three SWP refs are to Sh. 11, Mn. (or No, according to Palmer)
The other Amad ed Din is just NE of Shweikhah, presently part of Tulkarm.
Now, this is interesting, as according to Mayer, 1933, p.
73 there is a mausoleum there, with an inscription dedicated to
AmirAqush Al-Burunli, who died 1269 CE. Unfortunately, AFAIK, we dont have any pictures of either place on commons.
Also, I suspect the index is wrong, and that SWP II, p.
220 belongs to this second Amad ed Din, at Km.Huldra (
talk) 23:31, 13 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Birat Sorqua
Its Birat Sorqa, not Birat Sorqua! In Semitic languages "q" is not always followed by a "u" as in most European languages.
Menischt (
talk) 09:05, 18 May 2023 (UTC)reply
"Tulkarm was made the administrative center of the Bani Sa'b subdistrict in 1886"
Nablus Sanjak#Later Ottoman rule lists five nahiyas ("subsdistricts"): Jamma'in East (21 villages), Jamma'in West (25 villages), Mashariq Nablus (20 villages), Wadi al-Sha'ir (23 villages) and Sha'rawiyya (24 villages). According to that, Bani Sa'b was not among the subdistricts. It cites a source, available online, which however doesn't include such a list. The claim in this article, on the other hand, cites two sources, neither of which is available online. Thus, both claims are equally dubious, and I'm not sure which one to keep, and which to remove.
147.234.72.52 (
talk) 20:16, 14 August 2023 (UTC)reply
It isn't necessarily a contradiction, because the names and boundaries of the nahiyas changed from time to time. I'll add another source and remove one.
Zerotalk 12:46, 15 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Incorrect information
There is no official State of Palestine. It is not recognized by the UN and is officially occupied territory by Israel pending Palestinian acceptance of a peace dea.
2607:FB91:E52:8772:712E:C69D:8FD4:E8D8 (
talk) 23:50, 3 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Aren’t you special? Which of the hundreds of proposed peace deals turned down by Israel are you referring to? The UN has designated the West Bank as illegally occupied Palestine and that Israel is the “belligerent occupier.”
LegalResearcherSTL (
talk) 01:57, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
What? It was the Palestinian authority that turned down the 2 state solutions.
BFBChiller (
talk) 17:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Dead links etc
Why is this locked? There are several dead links. Not mentioned are the 100’s of attacks by the IOF on the Palestinians who live there. No mention this is a UN-designated refugee camps. Alternate spellings not given.
LegalResearcherSTL (
talk) 01:53, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The name
To editor
Eric Kvaalen: It is a classic case of
original research to contradict a reliable source on the basis of a dictionary. Unless, of course, the dictionary refers specifically to the name of this place, not just to the parts of the name that you believe had particular meanings in the 16th century (or earlier) when the current version of the name arose. Place names do not follow the logic of ordinary words and their interpretation is a specialist subject. That being said, I have found that the previous text is not a good report of the source (Al-Salim), which documents that the earliest known Arabic name was Toorkarm (mountain of vines) and that Tur- changed to Tul- during the Ottoman period for unknown reasons. I will edit this soon.
Zerotalk 08:02, 27 December 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Zero0000: Oh come on, it's not original research! I happen to know that word in Arabic, and it doesn't mean mountain, so I fixed it, with reference to two dictionaries! (A dictionary of "modern written Arabic" and a dictionary of classical Arabic, including long before the 16th century.) The meaning hasn't changed for thousands of years. We don't have to pretend to be totally ignorant when editing Wikipedia. The purpose of the "no original research" rule is to prevent false information and things like that, not to prevent someone from correcting the meaning of a word in a language he knows. If the reference that was there did say that "Tulkarm" meant mountain of vines, then it would not have been a reliable source! A source that says something false is not reliable.
And I already put that it's a distortion of Tur Karma.
Eric Kvaalen (
talk) 14:38, 27 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Every speaker of Hebrew knows that "shalem" is from the same root as "shalom", which has meant "peace" basically forever. That's how we get the popular interpretation of "Jerusalem" as "city of peace". However, the academic consensus is that it is a reference to the Canaanite god
Shalim. Only an expert could make that connection. The moral of the story is that understanding the meaning of a name requires a study of its history, not just looking in a dictionary. In our case, the source gives two alternative explanations why Tur- became Tul-, both of them related to the Turkish spoken by the rulers of Palestine and neither related to the fact that tul=length in Arabic. So, even though I'm sure you are correct that "Tulkarm" can be read as "length of vineyards", it is a jump to conclude that that was ever the intended meaning.
Zerotalk 02:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 April 2024
This article refers to “State of Palestine”. There is no such country. The legal name of the area is “ Palestinian Authority”.
Tulkarm has been under Israeli control since 1967 so it’s not correct to say it’s part of “Palestine”, when it’s not anywhere near the semi-autonomous Palestinian governances in the West Bank.
BFBChiller (
talk) 17:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply