This article was nominated for deletion on 7 February 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Apps Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Contribute to the project: history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Good article nominations : Improve Application software, Facebook and Instagram to good article status Stubs : Category:Mobile game stubs, Category:Stub-Class apps articles Computing: Software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance). JavaScript Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject JavaScript, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to JavaScript, and to the development of user scripts for use on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaScriptWikipedia:WikiProject JavaScriptTemplate:WikiProject JavaScriptJavaScript articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

All content removed was from the companies own website. It is advertising/marketing when the companies plants information in wikipedia and then uses their own website to back it up.

Thereandnot ( talk) 13:54, 1 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Not quite. If it's a direct copy of their text, then it's a copyright violation and should be removed, otherwise. it's just supported by a primary source, which isn't ideal, but not wrong. I have a serious problem with your editing though. I think you should avoid editing articles by your competitors until you have a better understanding of how Wikipedia works. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 15:10, 1 June 2014 (UTC) reply

These claims are not verafiable anywhere expect their own website. Small companies like these can claim anything on their website and it is not true. These are Self-Published sources WP:BLPSPS.

Competitors? What the hell are you taking about?! You are showing bad faith( WP:BADFAITH). I am not a competitor to this company. I am just calling this advertising like it is!

Thereandnot ( talk) 14:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Sorry. I confused you with an editor who has been complaining about articles like this and gutting them. Since you have cleared up my confusion, I need to clear yours up. Since this is not a biography of a living person, BLPSPS does not apply, WP:PRIMARY does: "Unless restricted by another policy, reliable primary sources may be used in Wikipedia; but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them". The material is not being misused as far as I can see, but perhaps you can explain it. I have restored the material while we discuss this. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 15:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC) reply

I edited the article to make it seem less deceptive to users. There is a healthy skepticism around these numbers they are pushing. They are the only ones reporting them. Thereandnot ( talk) 02:32, 12 June 2014 (UTC) reply

I noticed. I would argue it's poor writing as well, but you had an agenda and you can have your way this way too. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 04:18, 12 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Once again, I have no interest in this software or its competitors. However, I will rip down anything that seems like small or large corporate manipulation of people or violation of neutrality. If you feel like you need a neutral third party weighing in on a situation that is similar(corporation posting information about itself evidenced only by claims on its own website), post on my wall and I will step in with consistency. Thereandnot ( talk) 23:20, 20 June 2014 (UTC) reply

I don't have time to contribute based on this source at this time ... but can later ... unless you do it first :-) — "Trello: Your digital replacement for sticky notes and whiteboards?" at http://www.techrepublic.com/article/trello-your-digital-replacement-for-sticky-notes-and-whiteboards/ . --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 01:44, 24 September 2015 (UTC) reply

How to be take to the organisation page to add members click on the member tab 158.62.57.34 ( talk) 06:19, 17 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Architecture of trello app 206.84.224.97 ( talk) 09:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC) reply