This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
This article is part of WikiProject Animal anatomy, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to
animal anatomy apart from
human anatomy. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at
WikiProject Animal anatomy. This project is an offshoot of WikiProject AnimalsAnimal anatomyWikipedia:WikiProject Animal anatomyTemplate:WikiProject Animal anatomyAnimal anatomy articles
The first reference link doesn't work, please remove. I dont know how. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
82.135.158.20 (
talk) 07:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)reply
PamD, you removed the stub notice I added. What is your criteria that this article is not a stub? Did you go by numbers - 3 paragraphs, 15 sentences, 256 words, 1254 characters? Even going by the characters standard, this is a stub. Especially for a topic - Throat. Please justify.
Jay(Talk) 16:30, 7 October 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Jay: Yes: three well-sourced paragraphs and a couple of useful illustrations, plus the fact that it has been assessed by other editors as "Start" (see talk page). There is no template to add to say "This article should be expanded", although there is the "This section needs to be expanded" template which you previously added. If you think this article is seriously inadequate, divide it into sections and label the section(s) which need expansion - or expand it. Or perhaps post here on the talk page to discuss what more you think the article should include. Thanks.
PamD 16:45, 7 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Ok, I only looked at
WP:Stub and did not realize it runs contrary to the content assessment ratings. So are there rules that if an article has a content rating that is not stub, we cannot add a stub notice, or if an article is content assessed as not stub, an existing stub notice can be removed? I did not add the section expand notice though,
Kenzie.one did.
Jay(Talk) 17:50, 7 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Added back stub tag as no response was forthcoming. Jay(talk) 06:37, 21 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Jay, stub sorter here; it is not a stub: multiple sourcing, multiple paragraphs, infobox w/ image. However, it is certainly on the border between start and stub so it is understandable.
Curbon7 (
talk) 06:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC)reply
So again, are you going by the content assessment ratings or WP:Stub? Jay(talk) 07:28, 21 November 2021 (UTC)reply