This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge Wikiproject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the
University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the
project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the
discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
How this page/individual meets criteria 7, 8 and 3 of
Wikipedia:Notability (academics):
- Main criterium met is #7 "The person has had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity." [...] "Criterion 7 may be satisfied, for example, if the person is frequently quoted in conventional media as an academic expert in a particular area" => This academic individual has provided expert comments regularly for the Financial Times, the Telegraph, BBC, ITV News, Fortune, and other his research has been covered by the Economist, Bloomberg, the Financial Times and has written op-ed for Le Monde, Forbes, etc. (
source)
- Other criteria met are Criterium 3 "The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association" => The academic individual is mid-career fellow of the British Academy, elected member of the council and one of the 20 trustees of the
Society for the Advancement of Management Studies and Criterium 8 "The person is chief editor of a journal" => The individual was editor in chief of the first open access journal in the field of management
M@N@GEMENT
Criteria 1 on impact in the scholarly discipline is discussable but could be argued for. Published a book with multiple reviews.
Significant coverage?
Hi
LizK91. I was hesitant to mark the page as reviewed as I skimmed a bunch of the sources and had trouble finding ones that include
"significant coverage" of Roulet. Which of the sources do you think have the most in-depth coverage of Roulet himself? As I'm posting this I see the discussion linked above on notability and will review that as well.
Firefangledfeathers (
talk /
contribs) 17:36, 2 July 2022 (UTC)reply
but in terms of coverage on Roulet himself (and independent from the sources so I eliminated sources from his academic institution) that is what I found (by order of significance)
I think this is probably too much to be included. Hope this is somehow helpful!
LizK91 (
talk) 18:17, 2 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Thanks LizK9. Some of those are by Roulet himself, and others are
WP:INTERVIEWs containing mostly primary content. I'm generally wary about using event bios, which are often written by the speakers/presenters themselves (or their home institution's PR team).Also, I marked the page as reviewed based mainly on the NACADMIC criteria.
Firefangledfeathers (
talk /
contribs) 18:38, 2 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Good point! and good to know.
and many thanks for the review!
LizK91 (
talk) 18:50, 2 July 2022 (UTC)reply