The Woman Next Door (novel) is currently a Language and literature
good article nominee. Nominated by
Reading Beans at 01:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the
good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a
good article should be left to the first reviewer.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
novels,
novellas,
novelettes and
short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
Comments
Looking forward to starting in on this review! As I go, I'll fix minor things myself (and of course you can always revert/rewrite those changes, and make comments below with bigger concerns that I'll bounce back to you for edits.
~ L 🌸 (
talk) 18:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)reply
To comply with
MOS:LEAD, the lead should serve as a summary of the article as a whole, but the majority of the article information is not mentioned there. This is often quick to fix, but you should talk a look at each of the article's sections and make sure their key points are summarized in the lead.
~ L 🌸 (
talk) 18:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)reply
In terms of prose and breadth, it feels very unbalanced to have a single sentence in the "themes" section. Personally, I'd use the reception section just for the awards, and use all the cited reviews to build out, instead, a more robust "themes" section. The two key themes I'm seeing, based on the quotes from the reviews, are post-Apartheid politics and female friendship.
~ L 🌸 (
talk) 18:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Actually, I've just completed a spot-check of sources, and did some initial prose edits myself based on what I found. I'd say now that the "themes" section should probably be one paragraph on apartheid and one paragraph on aging and/or grief. I also think there's enough in the sources for a short "style" section, which I got started. Let me know if you want any more advice on how to proceed in repurposing the reviews from "reception" to organize them into these sections.
~ L 🌸 (
talk) 22:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
LEvalyn, thank you for your wonderful work! I don’t know how it happened but I’ve not been able to write constructive sentences for some days. I asked around, they said it’s “writer’s block” or something similar. Lol. I’ll reread the reviews now and see what I can flesh out. Best,
Reading Beans 04:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The development section is really great! A lot of book articles leave this information out so I wanted to specifically say that I appreciate the work here :)
~ L 🌸 (
talk) 18:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The plot reads a bit too much like a blurb rather than a summary, i.e., it leaves out the details of the main conflict and how it is resolved at the end (you may find
WP:PLOTSUM helpful)
~ L 🌸 (
talk) 18:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)reply