This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class.
BetacommandBot13:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Merge?
Yes this page should be merged with the other very similar page. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
130.88.162.213 (
talk •
contribs) 10:43, May 17, 2009
Merge indeed. This is not a book but a paper published posthumously; Weber has used his tripartite classification previously.
Ael 2 (
talk)
17:39, 16 July 2022 (UTC)reply
A mural in
Teotihuacan, Mexico (ca. 200 C.E.) depicting what is believed to be the first attempt by a person to create a Wikipedia contribution emitting a
speech scroll from his mouth, symbolizing speech, and a Wikipedia Administrator on the right
staring.
Reverted good faith edits by Maurice Carbonaro (talk): Badly formatted, and the only thing in common is "three" and "basis for rule" — it doesn't seem enough. ...
As usual, you have no idea what what you are saying means in English. Furthermore, I don't see any possible way what I said could possibly represent an NPOV violation. —
Arthur Rubin(talk)08:43, 1 February 2013 (UTC)reply
I don't see a connection between "Three types of legitimate rule" and "Three principles that motivate citizen behaviour" other than the number "three" and that they are prinicples. There may be one, but I suspect
rule of three is the only appropriate "see also" for either. —
Arthur Rubin(talk)19:27, 3 February 2013 (UTC)reply