This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Would the writer of this case please explain the following: 1. Is Ms. Hu equal to Aw Sian? 2. Who is the official of law and politic department? 3. What is the declaration that she actually published?
Actually, I would suggest if the news is part of the HK Standard Case, why not we integrate the two? It's really confusing here..
Thanks.
The image of the HK Standard is too blurred.. can we take a better one?
I see the impression part on the article and I don't think it should be included as it is very subjective and personal and should not exist on this journal.
Hello, Secretlondon, can yo please explain the changes that you have made, as I think it can be more detailed.
I delete "compares to other english newspapers available in the market" because I think other newspapers, for example Young Post of SCMP is also suit for the students to read, and the language is also not difficult, not just the student standard.
U mean we shouldn't focus too much on local, but put more infomation about the other 8 places?
The third paragraph seems too detail and should appear in newspapers of Hong Kong. The last paragraph seems too promotive. Gakmo 09:33, 31 Oct 2003 (UTC)
Dear all, I've added subsections in Content with just one line of description for each section in the Standard. Please read the newspaper and try to give a little more details about the different section in The Standard. - 0101CHONGmt 07:16, October 10, 2005 (UTC)
Since we are talking about the Hong Kong paper 'The Standard', the Belgian paper and the Austrian paper are totally irrelevant. Therefore, I deleted them from the article. - 0101CHONGmt 17:11, October 10, 2005 (UTC)
I guess this should not be included. anyone agree??
I've removed all the links to various editors with contact information as it does not seem relevant to an article which is meant to be encyclopedic. -- HappyCamper 12:52, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
The name of the newspaper was Hongkong Tiger Standard. — Insta ntnood 18:50, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Image:DaBinLo 009 after.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 07:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on The Standard (Hong Kong). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:10, 10 December 2017 (UTC)