This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
I just removed a completely
WP:OR statement in the last sentence of the plot. It claimed that "the expression on Picard's face reveals how much of a struggle it has been and how much he feels he has lost"
What a load of piffle. His face does not change, he simply tells the ambassador that the hopes he has a safe journey home.
One could equally believe that the facial expression shows that Picard might well have sampled her delights, finding her irresistable.
That, too, would be OR
Chaosdruid (
talk)
11:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)reply
You're right, the plot section should not include any such subjective interpretations. Plot sections should be just the plot, not commentary, and editors should avoid attempting to be mind readers. I thought this might have been a recent change but no, that wording goes back to at least
the version that passed Good article review in 2016. --
109.78.206.86 (
talk)
02:03, 8 May 2022 (UTC)reply