The
contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the
Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and
extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for
making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to
make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic
Palestine region, the
Palestinian people and the
State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting
the project page, where you can add your name to the
list of members where you can contribute to the
discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
novels,
novellas,
novelettes and
short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Shouldn't this article be less subjective? This is a dictionary afterall, not a blog.— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
66.227.166.179 (
talk) 07:33, 18 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Yeah, I'm wondering whether this article was deliberately written to make the novel look like crappy propaganda, or if it was written by someone deeply inured to racism and historical denial. The Palestinian / ALA leadership tries to drive the locals off their land, while the friendly Israelis
seek only peaceful coexistence! "The novel ends with Ishmael going insane and becoming delusional to the furthest extent because of the terrible life that his Arab culture had forced him to live." Wow... <
eleland/
talkedits> 01:48, 23 December 2007 (UTC)reply
having read the novel i find that it is unfortunetly very much like propoganda. ARabs are presented as “lazy,cowardly,boastful,deceitful,backbiting,lustful,underdependable, murderers, thieves and rapists” —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
69.54.62.158 (
talk) 15:23, 13 May 2010 (UTC)reply
I read it too. I would have to concur. The portrayal of Arabs and of Islam is very negative. I don't get it; all the Palestinians I've met have been decent folks.
Afalbrig (
talk) 13:53, 1 December 2011 (UTC)reply
It seems to me, having just read the novel, that the ARTICLE as it is as of Aug.24, 2011 is quite an objective & fairly detailed summary of the novel.The NOVEL itself may appear to some readers as rather pro Jewish/Isreal & very negative towards many aspects of Arab/Moslem culture. That is a charge that would have to be directed at Leon Uris, the novelist. We need to look at history, the other writings of Uris, and our individual experiences & values to reach a decision about the fairness & value of the novel's point of view.
124.6.181.81 (
talk) 03:31, 24 August 2011 (UTC) G.D. Aug. 24, 2011reply
Plot summary
I came to this article rather late, not having had any inclination until today to see what Wikipedia said about it. The plot summary
Sfdan added
in August 2006 is one of the best such summaries I've read in any Wikipedia pages about books or movies. I've read the book several times in the past 15 years or so, and Sfdan's summary is fair and accurate (I sent him a belated
thanks). It does not disparage Arabs in the terms claimed above by other editors in May 2010 and December 2011. –
Athaenara ✉ 03:50, 17 January 2018 (UTC)reply
I've read it too. It is profoundly racist from start to end. Some properly sourced critique is sorely needed in the article.
Zerotalk 07:09, 8 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Not Expository
Whether one agrees, or not, with the position presented in this article is irrelevant to the fact that it is not an expository piece and should not appear in any kind of encyclopedic publication. The very fact that there is an opinion with which to agree or disagree renders the piece unqualified to be presented as factually based. It sets out from the beginning to state and support a position on subjective matter, that is, it is an opinion piece. It should be removed in its entirety. No piece beginning from an article that chooses and interprets its fact to support an opinion can be transformed into objective exposition.
Smanion (
talk) 04:28, 9 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Lots of novels are propaganda.
Zerotalk 12:30, 5 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Requested move 14 June 2022
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support per nom. If the novel's page is moved, because the title "The Haj" (with the added "The" and the single-J spelling) is a little ambiguous (between
Hajj, and the novel, and
Al-Hajj), "The Haj" could possibly redirect to the disambiguation page,
Haj (disambiguation), perhaps.
Paintspot Infez (
talk) 19:27, 14 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Support and redirect to DAB per Paintspot, Google suggests there's no clear primary topic for the title with "The" and
Hajj gets 41,853 views compared with only 348[
[1]] for the novel but people searching for the pilgrimage will probably not normally include "The". Crouch, Swale (
talk) 20:55, 14 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Support, makes perfect sense.
Zerotalk 02:43, 15 June 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.