This article was nominated for deletion on 15 September 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by Another Believer ( talk · contribs) on 6 February 2020. It was contested by Coolabahapple ( talk · contribs) with the comment: multiple views (added to article) held by over 1800 libraries! so meets WP:NBOOK/ WP:GNG.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Novels: Crime Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Crime task force. Women writers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linked to this from the ESP disambiguation page and am not convinced this is not a bizarre prank of some kind. 170.74.56.78 ( talk) 18:51, 15 July 2013 (UTC) reply

This shouldn't have passed AfD with these sources. Librarian trade publications are not a sign of independent notability since they review fairly indiscriminately. (not watching, please {{ ping}}) czar 04:04, 23 September 2020 (UTC) reply