Texas State Highway 151 was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the
good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
state highways and other major
roads in the
United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I'm not very convinced of the article's GA status.
For starters, the article contains an {{update}} tag. Still looks valid to me, especially since most of the info on the page dates back to 2005 and doesn't take into account the reconfiguration of the intersection at Loop 1604, which is hard to explain without finding an appropriate source.
Another thing that irks me is that the article's "route description" is confusing to read. It often delves into irrelevant detail about businesses operating along the route (some of which don't even operate directly on the route, at least not anymore), and also features information that would be better suited in either the history section or a "future" section. Again, the same problem about outdated info persists here, for the very same observations as was mentioned in the first bullet point.
Therefore, under
quick fail criterion 3, I'm hereby de-listing this article from GA status immediately.
ToThAc (
talk) 21:47, 6 October 2019 (UTC)reply