This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was No MoveDuja► 10:46, 9 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose page move to
Soft Light. Insufficient disambiguation between the existing
Soft light (lower-case "l") and this article, if renamed.
Soft Light should remain as it is at present - a redirect to the most common use of the term,
Soft light. --Ckatzchatspy 07:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose I think people would expect the soft light article and not an episode article.
70.51.9.86 05:07, 31 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose per my anon brother. When I think of soft light, I think of the photography term. It is clearly ambiguous.
205.157.110.11 22:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
"Soft Light" was first broadcast in the United States on May 5, 1995, on the Fox Broadcasting Company → "Soft Light" originally aired on the Fox network on May 5, 1995.
Firstly, it's a primary source-based interview, so its notable. Secondly, the author is a regular contributor to
Andrew Morton's website/newspaper, The Morton Report, so he isn't just a random crackpot
Link--Gen. Quon(Talk) 20:58, 30 July 2012 (UTC)reply
On hold. Good work. TBrandley 17:25, 30 July 2012 (UTC)reply
There, I believe I've gotten everything. Thank you for the review.--Gen. Quon(Talk) 21:59, 30 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Will pass the artcle. Congrats! TBrandley 23:14, 30 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Irrelevant critique
The last segment of the critique section references a page that is no longer being maintained. Additional research being necessary to assess the significance of this critic, which doesn't seem readily available as the critic is not noteworthy themselves, seems to suggest this is a trivial segment and should be removed. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2603:8001:5602:B943:1C2F:21BC:4AD:6F32 (
talk) 10:41, 31 March 2022 (UTC)reply