This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is
related to the Philadelphia Museum of Art. Please copy quality assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed, and assign importance in accordance with the project's guidelines.Philadelphia Museum of ArtWikipedia:GLAM/Philadelphia Museum of ArtTemplate:WikiProject Philadelphia Museum of ArtPhiladelphia Museum of Art-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
I do beleive that the figure in the painting is grabbing itself by the breast. If you look closely, you can see a female nipple. Perhaps this was a statement that the rebels were being too harsh in their attempt to gain prosperity (represented as milk) from the state (the grimacing figure with the breast)
198.111.167.146 (
talk) 22:12, 14 June 2010 (UTC)reply
POV check?
the4re are some parts which may be biased regarding the motivees of Dali for painting the piece. Please check them out.— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
201.160.181.12 (
talk •
contribs) 17:20, 3 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Weak interpretation
The given interpretation seems to be written by someone less than professional, even going so far as to use the word "realistic" as opposed to life-like, thus attributing this painting to be of the realist movement. Perhaps some revisions should be made to the analysis section, or at least some words replaced to give off the intended meaning and make the overall page look more professional.
ChocoRokk (
talk) 20:42, 6 May 2012 (UTC)reply