This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose but relisting. See
WP:AT for the policy on article titles, and
Wikipedia:official names for an essay explaining some relevant aspects of the policy. It's possible that there's a case for the move in terms of policy, but it hasn't been made above, in fact there isn't any attempt to do so.
Andrewa (
talk) 19:01, 6 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Which section of the article you are talking about? but it hasn't been made above, in fact there isn't any attempt to do so. - Please explain. --
Tito Dutta(Send me a message) 01:07, 9 September 2011 (UTC)reply
No section of the article. I'm fascinated... why do you ask this?
Explanation... I'm a bit surprised any is necessary, but I'll try.
Wikipedia has a policy,
Wikipedia:article titles, to which the instructions at
Wikipedia:Requested moves and the header of this Requested move section both refer. In both places it's stated that requests for article moves should refer to this policy. Mostly this is by showing that the move conforms to the policy, but occasionally it may be by showing why the policy should
not apply. But in either case, we need to consider the policy. Are you with me so far?
This proposal ignores the policy and instead just gives a personal opinion as to what the article name should be. It may be a very good opinion, but that's not the way we work here, as stated in many places, see above. And there are good reasons for this, but that's probably enough explanation for a start. Any clearer?
Andrewa (
talk) 00:54, 10 September 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.