This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sheri L. Dew article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is very interesting. Here is a woman who is very accomplished, has spoken a great deal, has written a great deal, has influenced for good the lives of many people- and half of this article is about a little speech she gave and the people who overreacted to it. I will have to add more to this article in the near future to make it better represent this great woman. Isaac Crumm 08:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
I have personally heard Sheri speak, and have read many of her books. She has always spoken in very unifying, uplifting, and inspiring terms. It's unfortunate that one misconstrued point from one poorly phrased passage of a speech is the only detail some care to remember about this remarkable woman!
Someone please edit or remove this paragraph: "Other angry bloggers hurled attacks at Sheri, which were completely unrelated to any of her comments. Despite these personal attacks, she never retaliated." The paragraph seems vague, to say the least. It's also sexist, because it refers to Dew as "Sheri".
Utah Surfer
Requesting that more information be added to Dew's biography. More time is given to one speech than to the entirety of the article's other content. The article appears rather biased by this imbalance. She has given far more than one speech, and there is far more biographical information available than is presented in this article. Katquack ( talk) 19:16, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Sheri L. Dew is a prolific speaker and writer. The entry treats only a single, contentious issue. Needs more content and more balanced content. Ewbritton ( talk) 09:36, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Sheri L. Dew. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://newsnet.byu.edu/story.cfm/53573When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:23, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
It appears there is some wrong information that is perpetuated throughout Wikipedia. The name of the church to which Dew belongs is The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It has never been LDS Church. People might have referred to it in this way for a long time, but in order for Wikipedia to stand the test of time and to produce true and reliable information, the name of the church should be used. Regardless of any trends in how people refer to the church, the name of the church will not change and has never changed, so it is always accurate and most helpful to use the name of the church and not a term some people use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoobaloogle ( talk • contribs) 01:32, 14 June 2022 (UTC)