![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following could perhaps be turned into an encyclopedia article. PR propaganda has no place in Wikipedia. -- LMS
What is the SCORM (Sharable Content Object Reference Model)?
- A reference model that defines a Web-based learning "content model"
- A set of interrelated technical specifications designed to meet the Department of Defense's high level "
-ilities"
- A process to knit together disparate groups and interests
- A bridge from general emerging technologies to commercial implementations
- An evolving document to collect all the "bits and pieces" in one place
I was unable to find any information at all on CNET-NLN on the web - the only place where this term is ever mentioned is in copies of this article. I will therefore delete that column from the table in this page. -- 134.95.128.187 1 July 2005 12:37 (UTC)
It would be nice to have some links to free SCORM modules? Is there a repository? Hirzel 17:09, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
Check out these links. I am in the process of pitching Moodle to my college and I came across these: http://www.softchalk.com/pdf/LessonBuilder-Packaging-Moodle.pdf http://www.softchalk.com/lb_examples.html http://home.workforcecolab.org/course/view.php?id=17
I have moved this information off the main page because it is a mismash of junk:
Please reformat it using wiki formatting, and please try to provide some kind of sense to this before returning it to the home page.
Also, please do not link every word of this stuff unless there is a real need for standalone Wikipedia pages to define this stuff.
Nova SS 16:00, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Please discuss here before deleting external links, as described in Wikipedia's policies. Wikipedia:Resolving_disputes, Wikipedia:Edit_war, Wikipedia:Three-revert_rule -- BennyBeta 18:33, 2 September 2006
Some of the external links in this article should be listed as references and linked to the information in the article. See WP:CITE and WP:Footnotes. The external links section is not intended to be used to verify the information in the article -- see WP:External links. This article is currently unsourced, so I'm tagging it for references. -- SueHay 15:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
In my opinion, this article could benefit from further information on the following items. I plan to work through this list myself. Please provide feedback if you do not feel any of this is appropriate or any other comments.
Garemoko ( talk) 07:30, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
I am adding a legitimate compatible software package to this part of the page, but my entry is always removed. Why is my entry repeatedly removed? 2601:193:4100:6E10:8C71:FF3A:DFD6:F9E9 ( talk) 01:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sharable Content Object Reference Model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)