This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Senoi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Сеної from uk.wikipedia. ( 1001554256 et seq.) |
I think that it is such a shame that we couldn't preserve this people's culture into these days and beyond. They had to abandon their rich dreaming culture because of us, which is even of loss to us. We killed much knowledge about dreaming, by doing this to them, and now we'll have to research it again.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.209.63.202 ( talk) 18:11, 12 August 2003 (UTC)
Response: Consider it the consequence of the generally assimilated humanity of pundits with many predisposed assumptions. It is very unfortunate, and perhaps it can be realised that dogmatism in any regard is not expedient of attaining a rudimentary understanding of the world on an a priori level--or logical-metaphysical or even mathematical. Case in point, the scientific method is simply a manifestation of dogmatism within the scientific community and is widely cultivated with approval.
The article refers to "Kilton Stewart", yet all external references I've seen name the author as "Kilton Steward". I propose to make this correction, unless somebody soon persuades me not to.
yoyo ( talk) 05:14, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
.....................
Comment by TBL [ [email protected]}: Please see my comment under SEMANG.
............. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
99.203.207.120 (
talk) 01:40, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
The Demographics section says there are five groups of the Senoi but then lists six. I will change the number to six and hopefully that will not be a problem! Soulfulpsy ( talk) 03:41, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
The hiker is easier to see than the actual Senoi person the emphasis is on. I think we should change it to some other image, perhaps the one we use for Semai?-- Yellow Diamond ( talk) 21:23, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Unless I've got their identities confused. Which also might be a problem. We should get a photo with just Senoi. -- Yellow Diamond ( talk) 21:24, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Can't we just use the one we have on Semai? Is there a rule about using the same photo twice? I've seen photos duplicated as the lead image before - especially in taxonomy articles, so I don't see why we can't use the Semai one.-- Yellow Diamond ( talk) 17:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
I thought that the Semai were just a Senoi subgroup. It seems to state as much in the article. Every Senoi is going to be in a subgroup, Semai, Jah Hut, Temiar, etc., right? The man in the current photo must be from some subgroup too. So I think any subgroup photo is probably fine.-- Yellow Diamond ( talk) 03:47, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
... I don't think there are any others to discuss this,--
User:Yellow Diamond Δ
Direct Line to the Diamonds 04:04, 21 December 2016 (UTC)