This article is written in
Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is part of the Canada Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
roads in
Canadian provinces, territories and counties. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.Canada RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Canada RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Canada RoadsCanada road transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was merge Manitoba Highway 49 to Saskatchewan Highway 49MuzikMachine (
talk) 18:26, 26 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Merger discussion for Saskatchewan Highway 49 and Manitoba Highway 49
Support - USRD has several articles that follow this convention as well (ex.
State Highway 243 (Minnesota–Wisconsin)), and I think it's a good precedent when the highway has the same numbers on both sides and at least one side is especially short. - Floydianτ¢ 14:55, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Support. Concurring with Floydian here; however, I don't think the new title is necessary. I think we could just redirect the MB 49 article here and be fine. –
Fredddie™ 15:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.