![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Safety-related system page were merged into Safety-critical system. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (23 December 2016) |
Non of the Human made Systems are compliant to that error-rate not even Humans itself. Where Do You Got That From?
"A life-critical system is designed to lose less than one life per billion (10^9) hours of operation."
16:33, 16 February 2006 (UTC) Jan Girke
Comments:
With all these comments, the number may be misplaced. The article could focus on "higher level stuff" (but then again, the number has major impact on the design of life critical systems). Anybody up for a vote?
Nordby73 22:48, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
I'm interested in reliable system design - software design in particular - and I thought that article could be expanded. It explains well what a life-critical system is, but says fairly little about how such systems are designed and implemented. There was in fact no direct mention of Reliable system design and Redundancy (engineering), so I added these under the "See also" section. Also: reliability regimes are only one aspect of reliability; it would still be possible to create a reliable system that is not fail-operational, fail-safe nor fault-tolerant. (Think about cable cars: what happens when a cable fails?)
This is not to be construed as a criticism, because the article is already good in what it covers, and things I find missing are related to reliability in general, and are not particular to life-support systems. So, this is all just a suggestion... GregorB 20:58, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Minimal article that discusses a strongly related subject. Could be treated as a near-synonym in the lead paragraph, but I'm hesitant to do the merge myself as I don't know much about safety-critical systems.
QVVERTYVS (
hm?) 18:21, 23 December 2013 (UTC) Done
If this is "more commonly a safety-critical system", why not just rename it to safety-critical system? Disposable Redshirt ( talk) 02:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)