This article is
related to the Harold B. Lee Library holdings. Learn more about this collaborative project to improve coverage related to the BYU library's holdings, and how you can help
here.Harold B. Lee LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/Harold B. Lee LibraryTemplate:WikiProject Harold B. Lee LibraryHarold B. Lee Library-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Mormonism and the
Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project
discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to
classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the
guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the
project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by
Theleekycauldron (
talk) 02:42, 1 September 2022 (UTC)reply
I'd like to note that notability is not one of the DYK criteria in and of itself. If a reviewer is concerned about notability, the article should be either
WP:DISPUTETAGged or AfDed – preferably the latter, so the nomination can move forward quickly. That said, if the sourcing concerns stand, the nomination can close now.
theleekycauldron (
talk •
contribs) (she/
they) 02:42, 1 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Long enough: - article is only just over 1500 characters and is on the edge of being a stub.
Policy compliance:
Adequate sourcing: - Some assertions are not sourced and have cite needed tags. Some of the sources do not appear to be from super reliable sources (eg
Musicalics and
Motely Vision blog) or are very incidental mentions (eg newspaper list of graduates or advertisements of upcoming concerts).
Overall: Some quite major issues with sourcing and article size need to be rectified before approval.
Vladimir.copic (
talk) 02:43, 29 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Thanks for your review and feedback! I agree that the Musicalics article is not the most reliable source. I've edited out the information from that article. However, the obit from Motley Vision can be considered reliable. According to
WP:SELFPUB, a blog by an expert in the field is okay to use as a source, and Kent Larsen is an expert in the field of Mormon Letters. Even incidental mentions in newspapers are considered reliable, too. I think that the
BYU Special Collections entry on Taylor, the various newspaper articles about his works (
Papa and the Playhouse,
Coriantumr, etc), and this
newspaper article especially all support his notability. I hope that you'll review some of the edits I made to the article and agree that Rowan Taylor is a notable composer.
October(BYU) (
talk) 17:07, 1 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Still not sure about notability here so requesting another reviewer to look at this.
Vladimir.copic (
talk) 10:22, 8 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Giving some thoughts on this. I'm looking at the article right now and I'm not really sure if the subject is notable. As far as I can tell, most of the sources in the article are not exactly about him. They're either passing mentions or brief coverage. There's one source about his works. The Yule Concert source (
[1]) seems to be less significant coverage and more some kind of announcement or advertisement for his family's performance. Only one source, Motley Vision, appears to actually be about him, and as mentioned in the above review it's probably not enough to establish notability even if the writer is a subject expert. In addition, the source also claims he is "the most prolific composer", but such a strong statement needs a stronger source. I note that the claim is not in the article, it's just something worth noting. Finally, the "Honors" section may need work. I don't think Gradeyourprof.com is reliable, and both the "International Man of the Year" and "Outstanding Man of the Century" awards need attribution as to who exactly bestowed these awards. My suggestion is that the article probably needs to be sent to AFD for a wider hearing, but my opinion is that Taylor's notability is borderline at best; in my opinion, I'm leaning more towards the "not notable" opinion.
Narutolovehinata5 (
talk ·
contributions) 09:11, 25 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Unfortunately I don't see this nomination having a path forward owing to the notability and source reliability concerns. An AFD discussion could probably be started in the meantime too in order to test consensus.
Narutolovehinata5 (
talk ·
contributions) 11:20, 28 August 2022 (UTC)reply